Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25261302›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2015

Classification and evolution of human rhinoviruses.

Ann C Palmenberg, James E Gern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  7. Diagnostic potential of rhinovirus C using reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP).International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Detection of Rhinovirus in Clinical Samples by PCR.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann C PalmenbergInstitute for Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, acpalmen@wisc.edu.
James E Gern

Funding

Wisconsin Infant Study Cohort (WISC)U19AI104317 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI James E. Gern, CHRISTINE Marie SEROOGY · 2013 to 2026
$22.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI104317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The historical classification of human rhinoviruses (RV) by serotyping has been replaced by a logical system of comparative sequencing. Given that strains must diverge within their capsid sequenced by a reasonable degree (>12-13 % pairwise base identities) before becoming immunologically distinct, the new nomenclature system makes allowances for the addition of new, future types, without compromising historical designations. Currently, three species, the RV-A, RV-B, and RV-C, are recognized. Of these, the RV-C, discovered in 2006, are the most unusual in terms of capsid structure, receptor use, and association with severe disease in children.

Indexed as

CapsidCapsid ProteinsCommon ColdGenome, ViralHumansRecombination, GeneticRhinovirusCapsid Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25261302
PMCPMC4441521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.