Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25261290›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2014

Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75.

Michael S Simon, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Cynthia A Thomson, Roberta M Ray, F Allan Hubbell, Lawrence Lessin, Dorothy S Lane, Lew H Kuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael S SimonDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, 4100 John R HW4HO, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA, simonm@karmanos.org.
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Cynthia A Thomson
Roberta M Ray
F Allan Hubbell
Lawrence Lessin
Dorothy S Lane
Lew H Kuller

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVE-N01WH22110N01WH022110 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ROSS, PRENTICE · 1992 to 2006
$1.2M
CLIN CTR CLIN TRIAL/OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF WHIN01WH042118 · WH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENDRIX, SUSAN L · 1994 to 2000
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS P30CA022453NHLBI NIH HHS N01 WH042118PHS HHS 24152PHS HHS 32100-2PHS HHS 32105-6PHS HHS 32108-9PHS HHS 32111-13PHS HHS 32115PHS HHS 32118-32119PHS HHS 32122PHS HHS 42107-26PHS HHS 42129-32PHS HHS 44221WHI NIH HHS N01 WH022110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between mammography interval and breast cancer mortality among older women with breast cancer. The study population included 1,914 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at age 75 or later during their participation in the Women's health initiative, with an average follow-up of 4.4 years (3.1 SD). Cause of death was based on medical record review. Mammography interval was defined as the time between the last self-reported mammogram 7 or more months prior to diagnosis, and the date of diagnosis. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer mortality and all-cause mortality were computed from Cox proportional hazards analyses. Prior mammograms were reported by 73.0 % of women from 7 months to ≤2 year of diagnosis (referent group), 19.4 % (>2 to <5 years), and 7.5 % (≥5 years or no prior mammogram). Women with the longest versus shortest intervals had more poorly differentiated (28.5 % vs. 22.7 %), advanced stage (25.7 % vs. 22.9 %), and estrogen receptor negative tumors (20.9 % vs. 13.1 %). Compared to the referent group, women with intervals of >2 to <5 years or ≥5 years had an increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR 1.62, 95 % CI 1.03-2.54) and (HR 2.80, 95 % CI 1.57-5.00), respectively, p trend = 0.0002. There was no significant relationship between mammography interval and other causes of death. These results suggest a continued role for screening mammography among women 75 years of age and older.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyProportional Hazards ModelsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25261290
PMCPMC4278588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.