ReviewDer Orthopade2014
[Structural changes in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment after high tibial osteotomy].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Focal cartilage defects of the lateral compartment do influence the outcome after high tibial valgus osteotomy.SICOT-J · 2021Article
- The medial open-wegde osteotomy generates progressive intrameniscal integrity changes in the lateral knee compartment: a prospective MR-assessment after valgic osteotomy in the varus gonarthritic knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- Improved clinical outcome after medial open-wedge osteotomy despite cartilage lesions in the lateral compartment.PloS one · 2019Article
- [Meniscal lesion. A pre-osteoarthritic condition of the knee joint].Der Orthopade · 2017Review
- Large animal models in experimental knee sports surgery: focus on clinical translation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) increases the pressure in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment.
objectiveThe purpose of this work is to provide an overview about current knowledge on the effect of HTO on the lateral tibiofemoral osteochondral unit and lateral meniscus. MATERIALS AND
methodsStudies in translational models on the effect of medial opening wedge HTO on the lateral tibiofemoral osteochondral unit and lateral meniscus are reviewed and placed in the clinical perspective. Emphasis is placed on specific correlations between topographical alterations of the cartilage, subchondral bone, and meniscus in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment. DISCUSSION: Specific topographical relationships exist in the central region between the articular cartilage and subchondral bone plate thickness, and in the submeniscal periphery between the articular cartilage and lateral meniscus, emphasizing the important protective role of the lateral meniscus. Following standard correction, the pressure increase in the lateral compartment following valgus HTO does not induce significant structural changes in the lateral tibiofemoral compartment. A higher increase in pressure following valgus overcorrection induces adaptive changes in the lateral compartment, reflected by an increased specific bone surface (BS/BV) in the subarticular spongiosa compared with unloading by varisation. Valgus overcorrection also leads to a decrease in the number of cells in the red-red (peripheral) zone of the middle third of the lateral menisci, without structural changes.
resultsIn conjunction with the clinical data these results show that opening wedge HTO is a safe procedure for the lateral tibial osteochondral unit and the lateral meniscus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25261117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.