Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25260919›Full record

ArticleBiology open2014

Immediate and punitive impact of mechanosensory disturbance on olfactory behaviour of larval Drosophila.

Timo Saumweber, Carmen Cano, Juliane Klessen, Katharina Eichler, Markus Fendt, Bertram Gerber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. One-trial learning in larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Timo SaumweberInstitut für Biologie, Universität Leipzig, Tierphysiologie, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Abteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie (LIN), 39118 Magdeburg, Germany timo.saumweber@lin-magdeburg.de bertram.gerber@lin-magdeburg.de.
Carmen CanoInstitut für Biologie, Universität Leipzig, Genetik, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Present address: Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bonn, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Juliane KlessenAbteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie (LIN), 39118 Magdeburg, Germany.
Katharina EichlerInstitut für Biologie, Universität Leipzig, Genetik, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Present address: Institut für Biologie, Universität Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Markus FendtInstitut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany Center for Behavioral Brain Science (CBBS), 39016 Magdeburg, Germany.
Bertram GerberAbteilung Genetik von Lernen und Gedächtnis, Leibniz Institut für Neurobiologie (LIN), 39118 Magdeburg, Germany Institut für Biologie, Universität Leipzig, Genetik, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Center for Behavioral Brain Science (CBBS), 39016 Magdeburg, Germany Institut für Biologie, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Verhaltensgenetik, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany timo.saumweber@lin-magdeburg.de bertram.gerber@lin-magdeburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to respond to and to learn about mechanosensory disturbance is widespread among animals. Using Drosophila larvae, we describe how the frequency of mechanosensory disturbance ('buzz') affects three aspects of behaviour: free locomotion, innate olfactory preference, and potency as a punishment. We report that (i) during 2-3 seconds after buzz onset the larvae slowed down and then turned, arguably to escape this situation; this was seen for buzz frequencies of 10, 100, and 1000 Hz, (ii) innate olfactory preference was reduced when tested in the presence of the buzz; this effect was strongest for the 100 Hz frequency, (iii) after odour-buzz associative training, we observed escape from the buzz-associated odour; this effect was apparent for 10 and 100, but not for 1000 Hz. We discuss the multiple behavioural effects of mechanosensation and stress that the immediate effects on locomotion and the impact as punishment differ in their frequency-dependence. Similar dissociations between immediate, reflexive behavioural effects and reinforcement potency were previously reported for sweet, salty and bitter tastants. It should be interesting to see how these features map onto the organization of sensory, ascending pathways.

Indexed as

DrosophilaLearningMechanosensationMemoryOlfactionPunishment

Identifiers

PMID25260919
PMCPMC4197435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.