Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25260842›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2015

An innovative, multi-arm, complete phase 1b study of the novel anti-cancer agent tasisulam in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Robert M Jotte, Daniel D Von Hoff, Fadi Braiteh, Carlos R Becerra, Donald A Richards, David A Smith, Lawrence Garbo, Joe Stephenson, Paul R Conkling, Francisco Robert-Vizcarrondo and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting RNA splicing modulation: new perspectives for anticancer strategy?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert M JotteRocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Lone Tree, 10103 Ridgegate Pkwy Suite G01, Lone Tree, CO, 80124, USA, Robert.Jotte1@USOncology.com.
Daniel D Von Hoff
Fadi Braiteh
Carlos R Becerra
Donald A Richards
David A Smith
Lawrence Garbo
Joe Stephenson
Paul R Conkling
Francisco Robert-Vizcarrondo
Jian Chen
P Kellie Turner
Kay Hoong Chow
D Fritz Tai
Robert Ilaria
Eli Lilly (United States) · USThe US Oncology Network · USCompass Oncology · USComprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBNeurology Centers of the Carolinas · USNew York Oncology Hematology · USRocky Mountain Cancer Centers · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVirginia Oncology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase Ib study used a parallel, multi-arm design to examine tasisulam-sodium (hereafter tasisulam), a drug with complex pharmacology, combined with standard chemotherapies in patients with advanced solid tumors, with the ultimate goal of accelerating drug development.

methodsPatients received escalating doses of tasisulam (3 + 3 schema; target Cmax 300-400 μg/mL) every 28 days plus 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine HCl (days 1 and 15), 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel, 200 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide, 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin, or 150 mg/day erlotinib. Following dose-escalation, patients were enrolled into specific tumor subtype arms, chosen based on the established activity of the standard agent. Because tasisulam is highly albumin-bound, patients in the tumor-specific confirmation arms were dosed targeting specific albumin-corrected exposure ranges (AUCalb) identified during dose-escalation (3,500 h*μg/mL [75th percentile] for docetaxel, temozolomide, and cisplatin; 4,000 h*μg/mL for gemcitabine and erlotinib).

resultsA total of 234 patients were enrolled. The safety profile of tasisulam with standard chemotherapies was sufficient to allow enrollment into the dose-confirmation phase in all arms. The primary dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). The most common grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event was neutropenia, with the highest incidence in the docetaxel arm.

conclusionsThe multi-arm design allowed the efficient determination of the maximum tolerated dose of tasisulam across multiple combinations, and a preliminary characterization of pharmacokinetics, safety, and potential efficacy. Although enrollment into all planned groups was not completed due to termination of compound development, these data support the feasibility of this approach for accelerated cancer drug development, even for drugs with complex pharmacology.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesCisplatinDacarbazineDeoxycytidineDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedBenzamidesCisplatinDacarbazineDeoxycytidineDocetaxelErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabineN-((5-bromo-2-thienyl)sulfonyl)-2,4-dichlorobenzamideQuinazolinesSulfonamidesTaxoidsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID25260842
OpenAlexW2082638014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.