Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25260835›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2014

Update on animal models of migraine.

Marcela Romero-Reyes, Simon Akerman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Headache in people with epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021
    Review
  6. Migraine: Experimental Models and Novel Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Long-Term Depression Induced by Optogenetically Driven Nociceptive Inputs to Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis or Headache Triggers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Blink reflex in migraine headache.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcela Romero-ReyesOrofacial and Head Pain Service, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Radiology and Medicine, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 East 24th Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA, mrr7@nyu.edu.
Simon Akerman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a severe and debilitating disorder of the brain that involves a constellation of neurological symptoms alongside head pain. Its pathophysiology is only beginning to be understood, and is thought to involve activation and sensitization of trigeminovascular nociceptive pathways that innervate the cranial vasculature, and activation of brain stem nuclei. Much of our understanding of migraine pathophysiology stems from research conducted in animal models over the last 30 years, and the development of unique assays in animals that try to model specific aspects of migraine pathophysiology related to particular symptoms. This review will highlight some of the latest findings from these established animal models, as well as discuss the latest in the development of novel approaches in animals to study migraine.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAfferent PathwaysAnimalsDura MaterElectric StimulationHeadacheLaser-Doppler FlowmetryMiceMicroscopy, VideoMigraine DisordersNociceptionTrigeminal Nuclei

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.