Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25260750›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2015

The prevalence of brand switching among adult smokers in the USA, 2006-2011: findings from the ITC US surveys.

Monica E Cornelius, K Michael Cummings, Geoffrey T Fong, Andrew Hyland, Pete Driezen, Frank J Chaloupka, David Hammond, Richard J O'Connor, Maansi Bansal-Travers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Associations Between Exposure and Receptivity to Branded Cigarette Advertising and Subsequent Brand Preference Among US Young Adults.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure between Premium and Discount Brand Cigarette Smokers in the NHANES 2011-2012 Special Sample.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. It's complicated: Examining smokers' relationships with their cigarette brands.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Price-Minimizing Behaviors in a Cohort of Smokers before and after a Cigarette Tax Increase.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monica E CorneliusDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Pete DriezenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Frank J ChaloupkaInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David HammondDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Richard J O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Maansi Bansal-TraversDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Variation in Cigarettes, Tobacco use Behaviors and Exposures in ITC CountriesP01CA138389 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$13.4M
Project 3: Policy Effects on Cigarette Design, Emissions &BehaviorP50CA111236 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2004 to 2009
$8.2M
International Tobacco Policy SurveyR01CA100362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2005 to 2013
$4.7M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Epidemiology at UBR25CA113951 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI FREUDENHEIM, JO L., MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B. · 2007 to 2016
$2.5M
CIHRNCI NIH HHS P01 CA138389NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA111236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100362NCI NIH HHS R25 CA113951NCI NIH HHS R25CA113951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have suggested that about 1 in 5 smokers report switching brands per year. However, these studies only report switching between brands. The current study estimated the rates of switching both within and between brand families and examining factors associated with brand and brand style switching.

methodsData for this analysis are from the International Tobacco Control 2006-2011 US adult smoker cohort survey waves 5-8 (N=3248). A switch between brands was defined as reporting two different cigarette brand names for two successive waves, while switching within brand was defined as reporting the same brand name, but a different brand style. Repeated measures regression was used to determine factors associated with both switch types.

resultsA total of 1475 participants reported at least two successive waves of data with complete information on brand name and style. Overall switching increased from 44.9% in 2007-2008 to 58.4% in 2010-2011. Switching between brand names increased from 16% to 29%, while switches within the same brand name to a different style ranged from 29% to 33%. Between-brand switching was associated with younger age, lower income, non-white racial group and use of a discount brand, whereas, within-brand switching was associated with younger age and the use of a premium brand cigarette.

conclusionsNearly half of smokers in the USA switched their cigarette brand or brand style within a year. Switching between brands may be more price motivated, while switching within brands may be motivated by price and other brand characteristics such as product length.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsCommerceFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPrevalenceSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco ProductsUnited StatesYoung AdultAdvertising and PromotionPublic policyTaxation

Identifiers

PMID25260750
PMCPMC4743742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.