Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25260630›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2014

Misinterpretation of the mouse ECG: 'musing the waves of Mus musculus'.

Bastiaan J Boukens, Mathilde R Rivaud, Stacey Rentschler, Ruben Coronel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Annexin A4 Deficient Ventricular Myocytes Display Advanced Hypertrophy and Electrical Remodeling With Chronic β-Adrenoceptor Stimulation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bastiaan J BoukensDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63119, USA b.j.boukens@amc.uva.nl.
Mathilde R RivaudDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stacey RentschlerDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, and Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Ruben CoronelDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands L'Institut de RYthmologie et de modélisation Cardiaque (LIRYC), Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France.
Washington University in St. Louis · USAcademic Medical Center · NLElectrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute · FR

Funding

The Role of Notch Signaling in ArrhythmogenesisK08HL107449 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RENTSCHLER, STACEY LYNN · 2011 to 2015
$660k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL107449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ECG is a primary diagnostic tool in patients suffering from heart disease, underscoring the importance of understanding factors contributing to normal and abnormal electrical patterns. Over the past few decades, transgenic mouse models have been increasingly used to study pathophysiological mechanisms of human heart diseases. In order to allow extrapolation of insights gained from murine models to the human condition, knowledge of the similarities and differences between the mouse and human ECG is of crucial importance. In this review, we briefly discuss the physiological mechanisms underlying differences between the baseline ECG of humans and mice, and provide a framework for understanding how these inherent differences are relevant to the interpretation of the mouse ECG during pathology and to the translation of the results from the mouse to man.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyAnimalsHeartHeart DiseasesHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID25260630
PMCPMC4253466
OpenAlexW1590841714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.