Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25259959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Exposure and risk factors to coxiella burnetii, spotted fever group and typhus group Rickettsiae, and Bartonella henselae among volunteer blood donors in Namibia.

Bruce H Noden, Filippus I Tshavuka, Berta E van der Colf, Israel Chipare, Rob Wilkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Detection and Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Seroprevalence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Seroreactivity toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Schizophrenia andVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  18. High prevalence ofVeterinary world · 2020
    Article
  19. Human Bartonellosis: An Underappreciated Public Health Problem?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2019
    Review
  20. The Indian journal of medical research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bruce H NodenDepartment of Biomedical Science, Polytechnic of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Filippus I TshavukaDepartment of Microbiology, Namibia Institute of Pathology, Oshakati, Namibia.
Berta E van der ColfDepartment of Biomedical Science, Polytechnic of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Israel ChipareBlood Transfusion Service of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Rob WilkinsonBlood Transfusion Service of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.
Blood Transfusion Service of Namibia · NANamibia University of Science and Technology · NANamibia Institute of Pathology · NA

Funding

NCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS002902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of pathogen-mediated febrile illness in sub-Saharan Africa is receiving more attention, especially in Southern Africa where four countries (including Namibia) are actively working to eliminate malaria. With a high concentration of livestock and high rates of companion animal ownership, the influence of zoonotic bacterial diseases as causes of febrile illness in Namibia remains unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe aim of the study was to evaluate exposure to Coxiella burnetii, spotted fever and typhus group rickettsiae, and Bartonella henselae using IFA and ELISA (IgG) in serum collected from 319 volunteer blood donors identified by the Blood Transfusion Service of Namibia (NAMBTS). Serum samples were linked to a basic questionnaire to identify possible risk factors. The majority of the participants (64.8%) had extensive exposure to rural areas or farms. Results indicated a C. burnetii prevalence of 26.1% (screening titre 1∶16), and prevalence rates of 11.9% and 14.9% (screening titre 1∶100) for spotted fever group and typhus group rickettsiae, respectively. There was a significant spatial association between C. burnetii exposure and place of residence in southern Namibia (P<0.021). Donors with occupations involving animals (P>0.012), especially cattle (P>0.006), were also significantly associated with C. burnetii exposure. Males were significantly more likely than females to have been exposed to spotted fever (P<0.013) and typhus (P<0.011) group rickettsiae. Three (2.9%) samples were positive for B. henselae possibly indicating low levels of exposure to a pathogen never reported in Namibia. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that Namibians are exposed to pathogenic fever-causing bacteria, most of which have flea or tick vectors/reservoirs. The epidemiology of febrile illnesses in Namibia needs further evaluation in order to develop comprehensive local diagnostic and treatment algorithms.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsAdolescentAdultBartonella henselaeCat-Scratch DiseaseCoxiella burnetiiCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNamibiaQ FeverRickettsiaRickettsia InfectionsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25259959
PMCPMC4178180
OpenAlexW1976098093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.