ArticlePloS one2014
Codifying collegiality: recent developments in data sharing policy in the life sciences.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unmasking the ethical dimensions of data-sharing in health research: perspectives from researchers at a public university in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Overview of radiomics in prostate imaging and future directions.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Who should have access to genomic data and how should they be held accountable? Perspectives of Data Access Committee members and experts.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- "You want the right amount of oversight": interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016Article
- Make Data Sharing Routine to Prepare for Public Health Emergencies.PLoS medicine · 2016Article
- Analyses of Developmental Rate Isomorphy in Ectotherms: Introducing the Dirichlet Regression.PloS one · 2015Article
- Experiences in supporting the structured collection of cancer nanotechnology data using caNanoLab.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2015Article
- Data governance and open sharing in the fields of life sciences and medicine: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the last decade, there have been significant changes in data sharing policies and in the data sharing environment faced by life science researchers. Using data from a 2013 survey of over 1600 life science researchers, we analyze the effects of sharing policies of funding agencies and journals. We also examine the effects of new sharing infrastructure and tools (i.e., third party repositories and online supplements). We find that recently enacted data sharing policies and new sharing infrastructure and tools have had a sizable effect on encouraging data sharing. In particular, third party repositories and online supplements as well as data sharing requirements of funding agencies, particularly the NIH and the National Human Genome Research Institute, were perceived by scientists to have had a large effect on facilitating data sharing. In addition, we found a high degree of compliance with these new policies, although noncompliance resulted in few formal or informal sanctions. Despite the overall effectiveness of data sharing policies, some significant gaps remain: about one third of grant reviewers placed no weight on data sharing plans in their reviews, and a similar percentage ignored the requirements of material transfer agreements. These patterns suggest that although most of these new policies have been effective, there is still room for policy improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.