Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25259794›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

DNA barcode authentication of wood samples of threatened and commercial timber trees within the tropical dry evergreen forest of India.

Stalin Nithaniyal, Steven G Newmaster, Subramanyam Ragupathy, Devanathan Krishnamoorthy, Sophie Lorraine Vassou, Madasamy Parani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Development of DNA barcodes for selectedSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Spellbinding Interplay Between Biological Barcoding and Nanotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. BioData mining · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stalin NithaniyalDepartment of Genetic Engineering, Center for DNA Barcoding, SRM University, Chennai, India; Interdisciplinary School of Indian System of Medicine, SRM University, Chennai, India.
Steven G NewmasterCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Subramanyam RagupathyCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Devanathan KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Genetic Engineering, Center for DNA Barcoding, SRM University, Chennai, India.
Sophie Lorraine VassouDepartment of Genetic Engineering, Center for DNA Barcoding, SRM University, Chennai, India.
Madasamy ParaniDepartment of Genetic Engineering, Center for DNA Barcoding, SRM University, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia is rich with biodiversity, which includes a large number of endemic, rare and threatened plant species. Previous studies have used DNA barcoding to inventory species for applications in biodiversity monitoring, conservation impact assessment, monitoring of illegal trading, authentication of traded medicinal plants etc. This is the first tropical dry evergreen forest (TDEF) barcode study in the World and the first attempt to assemble a reference barcode library for the trees of India as part of a larger project initiated by this research group. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe sampled 429 trees representing 143 tropical dry evergreen forest (TDEF) species, which included 16 threatened species. DNA barcoding was completed using rbcL and matK markers. The tiered approach (1st tier rbcL; 2nd tier matK) correctly identified 136 out of 143 species (95%). This high level of species resolution was largely due to the fact that the tree species were taxonomically diverse in the TDEF. Ability to resolve taxonomically diverse tree species of TDEF was comparable among the best match method, the phylogenetic method, and the characteristic attribute organization system method.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the utility of the TDEF reference barcode library to authenticate wood samples from timber operations in the TDEF. This pilot research study will enable more comprehensive surveys of the illegal timber trade of threatened species in the TDEF. This TDEF reference barcode library also contains trees that have medicinal properties, which could be used to monitor unsustainable and indiscriminate collection of plants from the wild for their medicinal value.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEndangered SpeciesForestsTropical ClimateGenetic MarkersGeographyIndiaPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTreesWoodGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25259794
PMCPMC4178033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.