Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25259546›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hypertension2015

Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.

Dion H Zappe, Nora Crikelair, Albert Kandra, Paolo Palatini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00241124 (A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-Controlled Study To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Morning Versus Evening Doses Of 320 Mg Valsartan Versus 40 Mg Lisinopril On The 24 Hour Blood Pressure Profile In Patients With Hypertension And Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00241124 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Active-Controlled Study To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Morning Versus Evening Doses Of 320 Mg Valsartan Versus 40 Mg Lisinopril On The 24 Hour Blood Pressure Profile In Patients With Hypertension And Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartisRan2004 to 2005Enrolled1,099ConditionsHypertensionArmsvalsartan, lisinopril
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronotherapy for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of RCTs.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacotherapy for Essential Hypertension: A Brief Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. New Insights Into Cancer Chronotherapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chronotherapy for Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dion H ZappeaNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA bNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland cDepartment of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Nora Crikelair
Albert Kandra
Paolo Palatini
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies suggest that bedtime dosing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker shows a more sustained and consistent 24-h antihypertensive profile, including greater night-time blood pressure (BP) reduction. We compared the antihypertensive effects of morning (a.m.) and evening (p.m.) dosing of valsartan on 24-h BP.

methodsThis 26-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of valsartan 320 mg, dosed a.m. or p.m., versus lisinopril 40 mg (a.m.), a long-acting ACE-inhibitor, in patients with grade 1-2 hypertension and at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. Patients (n = 1093; BP = 156 ± 11/91 ± 8 mmHg; 62 years, 56% male, 99% white) received (1 : 1 : 1) valsartan 160 mg a.m. or p.m. or lisinopril 20 mg a.m. for 4 weeks, then force-titrated to double the initial dose for 8 weeks. At Week 12, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg was added for 14 weeks if office BP was more than 140/90 mmHg and/or ambulatory BP more than 130/80 mmHg.

resultsMean 24-h ambulatory SBP change from baseline to Weeks 12 and 26 was comparable between valsartan a.m. (-10.6 and -13.3 mmHg) and p.m. (-9.8 and -12.3 mmHg) and lisinopril (-10.7 and -13.7 mmHg). There was no benefit of valsartan p.m. versus a.m. on night-time BP, early morning BP and morning BP surge. Evening dosing also did not improve BP lowering in patients requiring add-on HCTZ or in nondippers at baseline. All treatments were well tolerated.

conclusionOnce-daily dosing of valsartan 320 mg results in equally effective 24-h BP efficacy, regardless of dosing time.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00241124.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCardiovascular DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionLisinoprilMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsHydrochlorothiazideLisinoprilValsartan

Identifiers

PMID25259546
PMCPMC4284009
OpenAlexW2329143808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.