Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25259521›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

In-vivo fusion of human cancer and hamster stromal cells permanently transduces and transcribes human DNA.

David M Goldenberg, Robert J Rooney, Meiyu Loo, Donglin Liu, Chien-Hsing Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How Do Cancer Cells Fuse and Why?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. The Hallmarks of Circulating Hybrid Cells.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Dark Side of Cell Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  11. Chemotherapy promotes tumour cell hybridization in vivo.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M GoldenbergGarden State Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Morris Plains, New Jersey, United States of America; Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey, United States of America.
Robert J RooneyGenome Explorations, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Meiyu LooImmunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey, United States of America.
Donglin LiuImmunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey, United States of America.
Chien-Hsing ChangImmunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey, United States of America.
Immunomedics (United States) · USCenter for Molecular Medicine and Immunology · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS CA11327NCI NIH HHS CA12374NCI NIH HHS R01 CA012374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After demonstrating, with karyotyping, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization, the retention of certain human chromosomes and genes following the spontaneous fusion of human tumor and hamster cells in-vivo, it was postulated that cell fusion causes the horizontal transmission of malignancy and donor genes. Here, we analyzed gene expression profiles of 3 different hybrid tumors first generated in the hamster cheek pouch after human tumor grafting, and then propagated in hamsters and in cell cultures for years: two Hodgkin lymphomas (GW-532, GW-584) and a glioblastoma multiforme (GB-749). Based on the criteria of MAS 5.0 detection P-values ≤0.065 and at least a 2-fold greater signal expression value than a hamster melanoma control, we identified 3,759 probe sets (ranging from 1,040 to 1,303 in each transplant) from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of the 3 hybrid tumors, which unambiguously mapped to 3,107 unique Entrez Gene IDs, representative of all human chromosomes; however, by karyology, one of the hybrid tumors (GB-749) had a total of 15 human chromosomes in its cells. Among the genes mapped, 39 probe sets, representing 33 unique Entrez Gene IDs, complied with the detection criteria in all hybrid tumor samples. Five of these 33 genes encode transcription factors that are known to regulate cell growth and differentiation; five encode cell adhesion- and transmigration-associated proteins that participate in oncogenesis and/or metastasis and invasion; and additional genes encode proteins involved in signaling pathways, regulation of apoptosis, DNA repair, and multidrug resistance. These findings were corroborated by PCR and reverse transcription PCR, showing the presence of human alphoid (α)-satellite DNA and the F11R transcripts in additional tumor transplant generations. We posit that in-vivo fusion discloses genes implicated in tumor progression, and gene families coding for the organoid phenotype. Thus, cancer cells can transduce adjacent stromal cells, with the resulting progeny having permanently transcribed genes with malignant and other gene functions of the donor DNA. Using heterospecific in-vivo cell fusion, genes encoding oncogenic and organogenic traits may be identified.

Indexed as

Cell FusionCell Line, TumorStromal CellsTranscription, GeneticTransduction, GeneticAnimalsCluster AnalysisCricetinaeGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25259521
PMCPMC4178054
OpenAlexW2029351609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.