Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25258718›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology research2014

Current status for gastrointestinal nematode diagnosis in small ruminants: where are we and where are we going?

Sarah Jane Margaret Preston, Mark Sandeman, Jorge Gonzalez, David Piedrafita

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Variability in the Response againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Haemonchosis: A Challenging Parasitic Infection of Sheep and Goats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The use ofThe Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah Jane Margaret PrestonBiotechnology Research Laboratories, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Mark SandemanFaculty of Science, Federation University, Northways Road, Churchill, VIC 3841, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-5823
Jorge GonzalezFacultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, Arucas, Las Palmas 35413, Spain.
David PiedrafitaSchool of Applied Sciences & Engineering, Faculty of Science, Gippsland, Northways Road, Churchill, VIC 3841, Australia.
Federation University · AUMonash University · AUUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) parasites pose a significant economic burden particularly in small ruminant production systems. Anthelmintic resistance is a serious concern to the effective control of GIN parasites and has fuelled the focus to design and promote sustainable control of practices of parasite control. Many facets of sustainable GIN parasite control programs rely on the ability to diagnose infection both qualitatively and quantitatively. Diagnostics are required to determine anthelmintic efficacies, for targeted treatment programs and selection of animals for parasite resistant breeding. This review describes much of the research investigated to date to improve the current diagnostic for the above practices which is based on counting the number of parasite eggs in faeces.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsAntibodies, HelminthFecesGastrointestinal DiseasesHost-Parasite InteractionsNematodaNematode InfectionsParasite Egg CountRuminantsAnthelminticsAntibodies, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID25258718
PMCPMC4166451
OpenAlexW2131114772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.