Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25258637›Full record

ArticleARYA atherosclerosis2014

In-hospital outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Hossein Vakili, Roxana Sadeghi, Parisa Rezapoor, Latif Gachkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ARYA atherosclerosis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Postoperative Assessment of Myocardial Function and Microcirculation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  7. Gender-related differences in long-term outcome among high-risk patients with myocardial infarction treated invasively.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Risk assessment in patients with an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hossein VakiliAssociate Professor, Department of Interventional Cardiology AND Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roxana SadeghiAssistant Professor, Department of Interventional Cardiology AND Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa RezapoorAssistant Professor, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine AND Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Latif GachkarProfessor, Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine AND Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not only to restore the blood flow in the infarct-related artery, but also to save the patients' quality and duration of their life. Since left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a known predictor of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients, the possible association between characteristics of a large group of patients who undergo pPCI with LVEF and death was evaluated.

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 304 patients who had undergone pPCI between 2009 and 2011. The association between LVEF and in-hospital outcomes of patients was assessed.

resultsLVEF ≤ 25%, 25% < LVEF < 50%, and LVEF ≥ 50% were presented in 23 (7.6%), 150 (49.3%), and 128 (42.1%) of the patients, respectively. Three patients (0.01%) died before echocardiography. There was no significant difference among aforementioned three groups regarding baseline characteristics, except age (P = 0.012) and sex (P = 0.016). Cumulative number of cardiogenic shock and death were 7 (2.3%) and 22 (7.2%), respectively; with significant differences between three LVEF groups. Age more than 70 years old, pulmonary edema, systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg, shock, post-PCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (MI) flow grade, corrected thrombolysis in MI frame count, angiographic success and ST-segment resolution showed significant association with death (P < 0.050).

conclusionThis study not only demonstrates that LVEF ≤ 50% is associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital adverse events, but also identifies characteristics that are strongly correlated with the risk of LVEF ≤ 50% and death after pPCI.

Indexed as

Corrected Trombolysis in Myocardial InfarctionEjection FractionMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID25258637
PMCPMC4173312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.