Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25258523›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2014

Nutrient-rich dairy proteins improve appendicular skeletal muscle mass and physical performance, and attenuate the loss of muscle strength in older men and women subjects: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Heliodoro Alemán-Mateo, Virginia Ramírez Carreón, Liliana Macías, Humberto Astiazaran-García, Ana Cristina Gallegos-Aguilar, José Rogelio Ramos Enríquez

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Effects ofNutrients · 2021
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heliodoro Alemán-MateoCoordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
Virginia Ramírez CarreónCoordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
Liliana MacíasCoordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
Humberto Astiazaran-GarcíaCoordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
Ana Cristina Gallegos-AguilarCoordinación de Nutrición, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C., Hermosillo, Mexico.
José Rogelio Ramos EnríquezLaboratorio de Análisis Clínicos e Investigación, Departamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico.
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, it is unknown whether the use of nutrient-rich dairy proteins improves the markers of sarcopenia syndrome. Therefore, our proposal was to investigate whether adding 210 g of ricotta cheese daily would improve skeletal muscle mass, handgrip strength, and physical performance in non-sarcopenic older subjects. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis was a single-blind randomized clinical trial that included two homogeneous, randomized groups of men and women over 60 years of age. Participants in the intervention group were asked to consume their habitual diet but add 210 g of ricotta cheese (IG/HD + RCH), while the control group was instructed to consume only their habitual diet (CG/HD). Basal and 12-week follow-up measurements included appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, handgrip strength by a handheld dynamometer, and physical performance using the short physical performance battery (SPPB) and the stair-climb power test (SCPT). The main outcomes were relative changes in ASMM, strength, SPPB, and SCPT.

resultsASMM increased in the IG/HD + RCH (0.6±3.5 kg), but decreased in the CG/HD (-1.0±2.6). The relative change between groups was statistically significant (P=0.009). The relative change in strength in both groups was negative, but the loss of muscle strength was more pronounced in CG/HD, though in this regard statistical analysis found only a tendency (P=0.07). The relative change in the balance-test scores was positive for the IG/HD + RCH, while in the CG/HD it was negative, as those individuals had poorer balance. In this case, the relative change between groups did reach statistical significance.

conclusionThe addition of 210 g of ricotta cheese improves ASMM and balance-test scores, while attenuating the loss of muscle strength. These results suggest that adding ricotta cheese to the habitual diet is a promising dietetic strategy that may improve the markers of sarcopenia in subjects without a pronounced loss of ASMM or sarcopenia.

Indexed as

CheeseAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedAgingDietary ProteinsFemaleGaitHand StrengthHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedMilk ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalSarcopeniaSingle-Blind MethodDietary ProteinsMilk Proteinselderlymarkers of sarcopenianutrient-rich dairy proteinsnutritional interventionricotta cheese

Identifiers

PMID25258523
PMCPMC4172033
OpenAlexW1992328832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.