ArticleInternational journal of shoulder surgery2014
Decreased scapular notching with lateralization and inferior baseplate placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with high humeral inclination.
Article in International journal of shoulder surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.The bone & joint journal · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical and radiological outcomes following complete release of the long head of triceps in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
- Robotic assistance improves reproducibility of planned glenoid baseplate inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Concomitant subscapularis tendon repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and assessment of superior migration of reattachment: a cadaveric biomechanical study.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Navigating the future: A comprehensive review of technology in shoulder arthroplasty.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Review
- Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of inverted-bearing reverse shoulder arthroplasty at minimum two year follow-up.JSES international · 2025Article
- Full-Polyethylene Glenosphere Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Functional outcomes and notching rate at mid-term follow-up.La Tunisie medicale · 2024Article
- Reconsidering the clinical outcomes of the stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty design implant.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Article
- Ten technical aspects of baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients without glenoid bone loss: a systematic review.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Review
- Relationship between the prosthesis scapular neck angle and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Shoulder & elbow · 2023Article
- Can surgeons optimize range of motion and reduce scapulohumeral impingements in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A computational study.Shoulder & elbow · 2022Article
- Conversion of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a unique hybrid glenoid component: technique and preliminary results.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2022Article
- Comparison of Lateralized Versus Medialized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- Anatomic versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a mid-term follow-up comparison.Shoulder & elbow · 2021Article
- Failed Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Recommendations for Revision.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020Review
- Activity following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: What should surgeons be advising?Shoulder & elbow · 2019Review
- Version and inclination obtained with 3-dimensional planning in total shoulder arthroplasty: do different programs produce the same results?JSES open access · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScapular notching is a radiographic finding of unknown clinical significance following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The purpose of this study was to determine how baseplate position affects the incidence of scapular notching and measure the clinical outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that low base plate position on the glenoid and new prosthesis design with a higher humeral inclination angle would decrease the incidence of notching at 2 years follow-up. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 54 patients with an average follow-up of 30 months met inclusion criteria and underwent radiographic analysis of scapular notching and radiographic measures to determine glenoid component placement. Clinical measures including visual analog score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and range of motion (ROM) were prospectively collected.
resultsThirty-nine of the 54 patients had no notching. 7 had Grade 1 notching, 7 had Grade 2 notching, one had Grade 3, and one had Grade 4 notching. Notching was associated with higher placement of the glenoid component as measured by peg-glenoid rim distance and base plate distance. All patients with no evidence of notching at 1-year, continued to have no notching after multi-year follow-up. Clinical outcome measures including ASES scores, ROM, and visual analog pain scores were improved at follow-up.
conclusionWe concluded that lower neck-shaft angle and low baseplate positioning led to a low incidence of significant scapular notching as only 6 out of 57 (16%) patients had notching Grade 2 and above. At short-term follow-up, this RTSA results in excellent clinical outcomes and a significantly lower scapular notching rate than traditional techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.