Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25258474›Full record

ArticleBiomass & bioenergy2013

Quantitative metrics of stove adoption using Stove Use Monitors (SUMs).

Ilse Ruiz-Mercado, Eduardo Canuz, Joan L Walker, Kirk R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomass & bioenergy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. How Do Household Energy Transitions Work?Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Toward cleaner air for a billion Indians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilse Ruiz-MercadoCivil Systems, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, 760 Davis Hall, Berkeley CA 94720-1710, USA ; Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, 50 University Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.
Eduardo CanuzCentro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, 01901, Guatemala.
Joan L WalkerGlobal Metropolitan Studies, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, 111 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley CA 94720, USA.
Kirk R SmithEnvironmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, 50 University Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.

Funding

INDOOR AIR POLLUTION AND CHILD ARI: A RANDOMIZED TRIALR01ES010178 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SMITH, KIRK R · 2001 to 2009
$4.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES010178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustained use of cookstoves that are introduced to reduce fuel use or air pollution needs to be objectively monitored to verify the sustainability of these benefits. Quantifying stove adoption requires affordable tools, scalable methods and validated metrics of usage. We quantified the longitudinal patterns of chimney-stove use of 80 households in rural Guatemala, monitored with Stove Use Monitors (SUMs) during 32 months. We counted daily meals and days in use at each monitoring period and defined metrics like the percent stove-days in use (the fraction of days in use from all stoves and days monitored). Using robust Poisson regressions we detected small seasonal variations in stove usage, with peaks in the warm-dry season at 92% stove-days (95%CI: 87%,97%) and 2.56 average daily meals (95%CI: 2.40,2.74). With respect to these values, the percent stove-days in use decreased by 3% and 4% during the warm-rainy and cold-dry periods respectively, and the daily meals by 5% and 12% respectively. Cookstove age and household size at baseline did not affect usage. Qualitative indicators of use from recall questionnaires were consistent with SUMs measurements, indicating stable sustained use and questionnaire accuracy. These results reflect optimum conditions for cookstove adoption and for monitoring in this project, which may not occur in disseminations undertaken elsewhere. The SUMs measurements suggests that 90% stove-days is a more realistic best-case for sustained use than the 100% often assumed. Half of sample reported continued use of open-cookfires, highlighting the critical need to verify reduction of open-fire practices in stove disseminations.

Indexed as

diffusion of innovationsenergy use behaviorfuel and stove stackingImproved stove disseminationindoor air pollutionmonitoring and evaluation

Identifiers

PMID25258474
PMCPMC4170739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.