ArticleCirculation research2014
Letter by Molkentin regarding article, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence: the pitfalls of Cre Knock-Ins in the c-Kit Locus".
Article in Circulation research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dual recombinases-based genetic lineage tracing for stem cell research with enhanced precision.Science China. Life sciences · 2021Review
- Arrhythmogenic risks of stem cell replacement therapy for cardiovascular diseases.Journal of cellular physiology · 2020Review
- Cardiac regenerative therapy: Many paths to repair.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transcription Factors in Cardiovascular Pathology.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Definition of a cell surface signature for human cardiac progenitor cells after comprehensive comparative transcriptomic and proteomic characterization.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genetic lineage tracing of resident stem cells by DeaLT.Nature protocols · 2018Article
- van Berlo et al. reply.Nature · 2018Article
- Cardiac Stem Cells in the Postnatal Heart: Lessons from Development.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Enhancing the precision of genetic lineage tracing using dual recombinases.Nature medicine · 2017Article
- The Elusive Progenitor Cell in Cardiac Regeneration: Slip Slidin' Away.Circulation research · 2017Review
- Most of the Dust Has Settled: cKit+ Progenitor Cells Are an Irrelevant Source of Cardiac Myocytes In Vivo.Circulation research · 2016Article
- Genetic lineage tracing identifies in situ Kit-expressing cardiomyocytes.Cell research · 2016Article
- Resident c-kit(+) cells in the heart are not cardiac stem cells.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Recent Developments in Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2015Review
- Generation of cardiac progenitor cells through epicardial to mesenchymal transition.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Review
- Cardiac aging - Getting to the stem of the problem.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2015Review
- Rejuvenating the senescent heart.Current opinion in cardiology · 2015Review
- c-kit(+) cells: the tell-tale heart of cardiac regeneration?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015Review
- Biomaterial Approaches for Stem Cell-Based Myocardial Tissue Engineering.Biomarker insights · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.