ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2015
Computational principles underlying recognition of acoustic signals in grasshoppers and crickets.
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Song recognition in Floridian Ormia ochracea reflects multidimensional temporal tuning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Genetic and viral approaches to record or manipulate neurons in insects.Current opinion in insect science · 2021Review
- Shared Song Detector Neurons in Drosophila Male and Female Brains Drive Sex-Specific Behaviors.Current biology : CB · 2019Article
- Acoustic Pattern Recognition and Courtship Songs: Insights from Insects.Annual review of neuroscience · 2019Review
- Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns: basic ethological concepts as drivers for neuroethological studies on acoustic communication in Orthoptera.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019Review
- Relative weighting of acoustic information during mating decisions in grasshoppers indicates signatures of sexual selection.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017Article
- Song pattern recognition in crickets based on a delay-line and coincidence-detector mechanism.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017Article
- Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Sequential Filtering Processes Shape Feature Detection in Crickets: A Framework for Song Pattern Recognition.Frontiers in physiology · 2016Review
- An auditory feature detection circuit for sound pattern recognition.Science advances · 2015Article
- Temporal integration at consecutive processing stages in the auditory pathway of the grasshopper.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Computational themes of peripheral processing in the auditory pathway of insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015Review
- Insect hearing: from physics to ecology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015Article
- Processing of Natural Echolocation Sequences in the Inferior Colliculus of Seba's Fruit Eating Bat,eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grasshoppers and crickets independently evolved hearing organs and acoustic communication. They differ considerably in the organization of their auditory pathways, and the complexity of their songs, which are essential for mate attraction. Recent approaches aimed at describing the behavioral preference functions of females in both taxa by a simple modeling framework. The basic structure of the model consists of three processing steps: (1) feature extraction with a bank of 'LN models'-each containing a linear filter followed by a nonlinearity, (2) temporal integration, and (3) linear combination. The specific properties of the filters and nonlinearities were determined using a genetic learning algorithm trained on a large set of different song features and the corresponding behavioral response scores. The model showed an excellent prediction of the behavioral responses to the tested songs. Most remarkably, in both taxa the genetic algorithm found Gabor-like functions as the optimal filter shapes. By slight modifications of Gabor filters several types of preference functions could be modeled, which are observed in different cricket species. Furthermore, this model was able to explain several so far enigmatic results in grasshoppers. The computational approach offered a remarkably simple framework that can account for phenotypically rather different preference functions across several taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25258206What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.