Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25258035›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2014

Time trends in gastroparesis treatment.

Anwar Dudekula, Shiraz Rahim, Klaus Bielefeldt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diabetic Gastroparesis.Endocrine reviews · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anwar DudekulaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Shiraz Rahim
Klaus Bielefeldt
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile delayed emptying is the defining criterion for gastroparesis, prokinetics often only have a limited impact on symptoms and have been associated with potentially serious adverse effects. The goal of this study was to determine how this information and regulatory changes affected gastroparesis management.

methodsThe electronic medical records of patients seen between 2003 and 2012 in the outpatient clinic of a large tertiary center were retrieved based on the billing diagnosis of gastroparesis. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were abstracted.

resultsA total of 709 patients were identified, with diabetes (21.2 %) and prior surgery (9.8 %) being the most common identifiable causes. The majority of patients (56 %) had idiopathic gastroparesis. The cohort was female predominant (79.5 %) with an average age of 45.4 ± 0.6 years. At the index encounter, 61.8 % received prokinetics. About one-third (37.7 %) used antiemetics at least intermittently. Between 2003 and 2012, prokinetic use dropped from 81 to 43 %, while the use of antiemetics increased from 14 to 41 %. Similarly, there was a significant increase in prescribed opioids and antidepressants. During the period of the study, 44 patients (6.2 %) died. Increasing age, a higher comorbidity burden, anxiety, and medication use were associated with higher mortality risks.

conclusionThis large outpatient cohort suggests that treatment trends move away from prokinetics and focus on symptom-oriented therapy and/or confounding mood disorders.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsGastroparesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesGastrointestinal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25258035
OpenAlexW2058952696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.