Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25257982›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2015

Comparison of puff topography, toxicant exposure, and subjective effects in low- and high-frequency waterpipe users: a double-blind, placebo-control study.

Caroline O Cobb, Melissa D Blank, Alejandra Morlett, Alan Shihadeh, Ezzat Jaroudi, Nareg Karaoghlanian, Barbara Kilgalen, Janet Austin, Michael F Weaver, Thomas Eissenberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Waterpipe Size Matters: The Effect of Waterpipe Size on Toxicant Exposures and Subjective Experiences.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Acute effects of snus in never-tobacco users: a pilot study.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Procedure to Standardize Puff Topography During Evaluations of Acute Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Exposure.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Group Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Increases Smoke Toxicant Concentration.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline O CobbSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Legacy, Washington, DC;
Melissa D BlankDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV;
Alejandra MorlettDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;
Alan ShihadehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon;
Ezzat JaroudiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Currently at the Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;
Nareg KaraoghlanianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon;
Barbara KilgalenDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;
Janet AustinDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA;
Michael F WeaverDepartment of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Currently at the Center for Neurobehavioral Research on Addiction, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX.
Thomas EissenbergDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; teissenb@vcu.edu.

Funding

Training and Education Core p270-287P50DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2013 to 2017
$19.2M
Waterpipe tobacco smoke: toxicant exposure and effectsR01CA120142 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
REALTIME waterpipe tobacco smoke toxicant sampling in the natural environmentR01DA025659 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN, SHIHADEH, ALAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Evaluating the acute effects of caffeinated waterpipe tobaccoF31DA028102 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI COBB, CAROLINE O · 2010 to 2011
$62k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA120142NIDA NIH HHS F31DA028102NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036105NIDA NIH HHS R01DA025659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical laboratory work among intermittent and daily waterpipe tobacco smokers has revealed significant risks for tobacco dependence and disease associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS). No studies have compared these groups directly. This study examined whether WTS frequency was associated with differential puff topography, toxicant exposure, and subjective response using a placebo-control design.

methodsEighty participants reporting WTS of 2-5 episodes (LOW; n = 63) or ≥20 episodes (HIGH; n = 17) per month for ≥6 months completed 2 double-blind, counterbalanced 2-hr sessions that were preceded by ≥12hr of tobacco abstinence. Sessions differed by product smoked ad libitum for 45+ min: preferred brand/flavor of waterpipe tobacco (active) or a flavor-matched tobacco-free waterpipe product (placebo). Outcomes included puff topography, plasma nicotine, carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), and subjective response.

resultsHIGH users had more puffs, shorter inter-puff-intervals, and a higher total puff volume for placebo relative to active, as well as relative to LOW users during placebo. Plasma nicotine concentrations increased when smoking active (but not placebo) with no significant differences between groups at 25min post-product administration. COHb increased significantly during all conditions; the largest increase was for HIGH users when smoking placebo. There was some evidence of higher baseline scores for nicotine/tobacco nicotine abstinence symptomology.

conclusionsHigher frequency waterpipe users may be more sensitive to the effects of waterpipe smoke nicotine content. Among HIGH users, higher baseline nicotine/tobacco abstinence symptoms may indicate greater nicotine dependence. These data support continued surveillance of WTS and development of dependence measures specific to this product.

Indexed as

AdolescentArterial PressureCarbon MonoxideCarboxyhemoglobinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFlavoring AgentsHazardous SubstancesHeart RateHumansInhalation ExposureMaleNicotineSmokingTobacco ProductsTobacco Use DisorderCarbon MonoxideCarboxyhemoglobinFlavoring AgentsHazardous SubstancesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID25257982
PMCPMC4838047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.