Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25257034›Full record

ReviewBrain research2015

Schwann cell transplantation and descending propriospinal regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Ling-Xiao Deng, Chandler Walker, Xiao-Ming Xu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ling-Xiao DengDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman and Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. Electronic address: dengl@iupui.edu.
Chandler WalkerSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman and Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Xiao-Ming XuDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman and Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Reprogramming reactive glial cells into functional new neurons after SCIR01NS111776 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WU, WEI, ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Tissue engineering in spinal cord regenerationR01NS050243 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WEN, XUEJUN · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Role of phospholipase A2 in spinal cord secondary injuryR01NS059622 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI XU, XIAO-MING · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050243NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059622NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After spinal cord injury (SCI), poor ability of damaged axons of the central nervous system (CNS) to regenerate causes very limited functional recovery. Schwann cells (SCs) have been widely explored as promising donors for transplantation to promote axonal regeneration in the CNS including the spinal cord. Compared with other CNS axonal pathways, injured propriospinal tracts display the strongest regenerative response to SC transplantation. Even without providing additional neurotrophic factors, propriospinal axons can grow into the SC environment which is rarely seen in supraspinal tracts. Propriospinal tract has been found to respond to several important neurotrophic factors secreted by SCs. Therefore, the SC is considered to be one of the most promising candidates for cell-based therapies for SCI. Since many reviews have already appeared on topics of SC transplantation in SCI repair, this review will focus particularly on the rationale of SC transplantation in mediating descending propriospinal axonal regeneration as well as optimizing such regeneration by using different combinatorial strategies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord RegenerationAnimalsAxonsHumansNerve Growth FactorsRecovery of FunctionSchwann CellsSpinal Cord InjuriesNerve Growth FactorsAxonal regenerationDescending propriospinal tractPeripheral nerveSchwann cellSpinal cord injuryTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID25257034
PMCPMC4375094
OpenAlexW2093962029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.