Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25257026›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2014

A multi-channel device for high-density target-selective stimulation and long-term monitoring of cells and subcellular features in C. elegans.

Hyewon Lee, Shin Ae Kim, Sean Coakley, Paula Mugno, Marc Hammarlund, Massimo A Hilliard, Hang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lab on a chip · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microfluidic approaches forAnimal cells and systems · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Automated phenotyping and lifespan assessment of aTranslational medicine of aging · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyewon Lee *School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Shin Ae Kim *School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Sean CoakleyQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Paula MugnoQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Marc HammarlundDepartment of Genetics, Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair, Yale University.
Massimo A HilliardQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.
Hang LuSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Funding

Quantitative microscopy-based rapid phenotyping and screeningR01GM088333 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG · 2011 to 2018
$2.3M
Sources, transmission and effects of transcriptional noise in C. elegans agingR01AG035317 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG · 2009 to 2011
$837k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG035317NIA NIH HHS R01AG035317NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088333NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM088333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective cell ablation can be used to identify neuronal functions in multicellular model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans. The optogenetic tool KillerRed facilitates selective ablation by enabling light-activated damage of cell or subcellular components in a temporally and spatially precise manner. However, the use of KillerRed requires stimulating (5 min-1 h), culturing (~24 h) and imaging (often repeatedly) a large number of individual animals. Current manual manipulation methods are limited by their time-consuming, labor-intensive nature, and their usage of anesthetics. To facilitate large-scale selective ablation, culturing, and repetitive imaging, we developed a densely-packed multi-channel device and used it to perform high-throughput neuronal ablation on KillerRed-expressing animals. The ability to load worms in identical locations with high loading efficiency allows us to ablate selected neurons in multiple worms simultaneously. Our device also enables continuous observation of animals for 24 h following KillerRed activation, and allows the animals to be recovered for behavioural assays. We expect this multi-channel device to facilitate a broad range of long-term imaging and selective illumination experiments in neuroscience.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalEquipment DesignFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesOptogeneticsFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent Proteinskiller red protein, Anthomedusae

Identifiers

PMID25257026
PMCPMC4213302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.