Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25257023›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology2014

Accounting for randomness in measurement and sampling in studying cancer cell population dynamics.

Siavash Ghavami, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Farshad Lahouti, Mukhtar Ullah, Michael Linnebacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siavash GhavamiDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. s.ghavami@ut.ac.ir.
Olaf WolkenhauerStellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS), Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Farshad LahoutiCenter for Wireless Multimedia Communications, Center of Excellence in Applied Electromagnetic Systems, School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mukhtar UllahDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael LinnebacherDepartment of General, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing the expected temporal evolution of the proportion of different cell types in sample tissues gives an indication about the progression of the disease and its possible response to drugs. Such systems have been modelled using Markov processes. We here consider an experimentally realistic scenario in which transition probabilities are estimated from noisy cell population size measurements. Using aggregated data of FACS measurements, we develop MMSE and ML estimators and formulate two problems to find the minimum number of required samples and measurements to guarantee the accuracy of predicted population sizes. Our numerical results show that the convergence mechanism of transition probabilities and steady states differ widely from the real values if one uses the standard deterministic approach for noisy measurements. This provides support for our argument that for the analysis of FACS data one should consider the observed state as a random variable. The second problem we address is about the consequences of estimating the probability of a cell being in a particular state from measurements of small population of cells. We show how the uncertainty arising from small sample sizes can be captured by a distribution for the state probability.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell ProliferationComputer SimulationFlow CytometryModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID25257023
PMCPMC8687262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.