Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25257022›Full record

ReviewIET systems biology2014

Dynamic flux balance analysis for synthetic microbial communities.

Michael A Henson, Timothy J Hanly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IET systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Reconstruction of human metabolic models with large language models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Constraint-Based Metabolic Modeling Approach for Microbial Communities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. COmmunity and Single Microbe Optimisation System (COSMOS).NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael A HensonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01007, USA. henson@ecs.umass.edu.
Timothy J HanlyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01007, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic flux balance analysis (DFBA) is an extension of classical flux balance analysis that allows the dynamic effects of the extracellular environment on microbial metabolism to be predicted and optimised. Recently this computational framework has been extended to microbial communities for which the individual species are known and genome-scale metabolic reconstructions are available. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the emerging DFBA approach with a focus on two case studies involving the conversion of mixed hexose/pentose sugar mixtures by synthetic microbial co-culture systems. These case studies illustrate the key requirements of the DFBA approach, including the incorporation of individual species metabolic reconstructions, formulation of extracellular mass balances, identification of substrate uptake kinetics, numerical solution of the coupled linear program/differential equations and model adaptation for common, suboptimal growth conditions and identified species interactions. The review concludes with a summary of progress to date and possible directions for future research.

Indexed as

Metabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalBiomassEscherichia coliExtracellular SpaceGlucoseIntracellular SpaceMicrobial ConsortiaSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologySystems BiologyXyloseGlucoseXylose

Identifiers

PMID25257022
PMCPMC8687154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.