Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25256984›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2014

Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.

A Alani, M Kelleher, K Bishop

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In vitro Interactions betweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Development of Antibacterial Ti-CuMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A AlaniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS.
M KelleherDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS.
K BishopDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Maxillofacial Unit, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-implantitis is a relatively new disease process that results in gingival inflammation and bone loss around implants. The associated co-morbidities are significant due to the relative financial and biological costs of implant provision. At the current time there is a lack of consensus on the exact aetiology and subsequent pathological process, although this is largely thought to be infective in nature. Unfortunately, due to the relatively new nature of this problem, evidence is continually emerging on diagnosis, prevention, prevalence and incidence. This first part of three reviews will discuss these points and will act as an introduction to part two on prevention and part three on management of this now significant dental pathology.

Indexed as

HumansPatient Education as TopicPeri-ImplantitisProsthesis FailureRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.