ReviewFertility and sterility2014
World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research.
Review in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 128 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transvaginal Ultrasound-guided Culdocentesis for Peritoneal Fluid Cytokines in Patients With Possible Superficial Endometriosis But no Ultrasound-diagnosed Ovarian or Deep Endometriosis (SPG)
Glycemic Regulation as Endometriosis Adjunct Treatment
Who cites it
128 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Homologous): homologous rodent models.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Pooled it
- An integrated multi-tissue approach for endometriosis candidate biomarkers: a systematic review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The genetic basis of endometriosis and comorbidity with other pain and inflammatory conditions.Nature genetics · 2023Pooled it
- The miRNA Mirage: How Close Are We to Finding a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Endometriosis? A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Reevaluating response and failure of medical treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review.Fertility and sterility · 2017Pooled it
- Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Endometrial biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of eliapixant in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b SCHUMANN study.BMC women's health · 2024Trial
- Supplementation with vitamin D or ω-3 fatty acids in adolescent girls and young women with endometriosis (SAGE): a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Trial
- Technical Verification and Assessment of Independent Validation of Biomarker Models for Endometriosis.BioMed research international · 2019Trial
- Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Pelvic Dysfunction Composite Score (PDCS): A Pilot Study in Women with Endometriosis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Endometriosis risk factors and comorbidities by endometriosis lesion macrophenotypes: an analysis from the What is Endometriosis (WisE) study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Symptom Flares in Endometriosis: Burden, Self-Management and Barriers to Care in a Cross-Sectional Survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- [Endometriosis pain research in Germany : ENDO-PAIN and StEPP-UPP-two new research consortia on endometriosis pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transcriptome differences in lesions by color, and cancer mutations in endometriosis.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Article
- Translational Assessment of Omics Approaches in Endometriosis: Bridging Molecular Discovery with Clinical Utility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo harmonize the collection of nonsurgical clinical and epidemiologic data relevant to endometriosis research, allowing large-scale collaboration.
designAn international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries on five continents.
settingIn 2013, two workshops followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTION(S): Development of a self-administered endometriosis patient questionnaire (EPQ), based on [1] systematic comparison of questionnaires from eight centers that collect data from endometriosis cases (and controls/comparison women) on a medium to large scale (publication on >100 cases); [2] literature evidence; and [3] several global consultation rounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standard recommended and minimum required questionnaires to capture detailed clinical and covariate data. RESULT(S): The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information. CONCLUSION(S): The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research, but is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology. The instruments will be reviewed based on feedback from investigators, and-after a first review after 1 year-triannually through systematic follow-up surveys. Updated versions will be made available through http://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.