Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25256929›Full record

ReviewFertility and sterility2014

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: III. Fluid biospecimen collection, processing, and storage in endometriosis research.

Nilufer Rahmioglu, Amelie Fassbender, Allison F Vitonis, Shelley S Tworoger, Lone Hummelshoj, Thomas M D'Hooghe, G David Adamson, Linda C Giudice, Christian M Becker, Krina T Zondervan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fertility and sterility, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Bioactive factors in endometriosis peritoneal fluid remodel human cardiomyocytes.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. miRNA in Endometriosis-A New Hope or an Illusion?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nilufer RahmiogluWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amelie FassbenderOrgan Systems, Department of Development and Regeneration, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Allison F VitonisDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Center for Endometriosis, Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shelley S TworogerChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lone HummelshojWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF), London, United Kingdom.
Thomas M D'HoogheOrgan Systems, Department of Development and Regeneration, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
G David AdamsonWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF), London, United Kingdom; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Fertility Physicians of Northern California, Palo Alto, California.
Linda C GiudiceWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF), London, United Kingdom; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Christian M BeckerNuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Krina T ZondervanWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Endometriosis CaRe Centre Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: krinaz@well.ox.ac.uk.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Center for Endometriosis, Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
WERF EPHect Working Group

Funding

Project 4: Human Endometrial Programming for Successful ImplantationP50HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIUDICE, LINDA C · 2014 to 2022
$16.4M
Trophoblast Differentiation in In Vivo and In Vitro Fertilized EmbryosU54HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BLELLOCH, ROBERT · 2007 to 2013
$11.5M
Dioxin Exposure and the Invasive Pathogenesis of EndometriosisR01ES014942 · NIEHS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BRUNER-TRAN, KAYLON L, OSTEEN, KEVIN G · 2006 to 2016
$3.5M
The Neural Immune Mechanisms and Genetic Influences on Chronic Pelvic PainZ01HD008769 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI STRATTON, PAMELA · 2004 to 2008
$3.5M
Immunology, Inflammation, and EndometriosisR01HD057210 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MISSMER, STACEY ANN · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of HealthIntramural NIH HHS Z01 HD008769Medical Research Council G0601458Medical Research Council MR/K011480/1NICHD NIH HHS HD008769-11NICHD NIH HHS HD57210NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055764NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057210NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD055764NICHD NIH HHS U54HD 055764NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014942Wellcome Trust 085235Wellcome Trust WT085235/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo harmonize standard operating procedures (SOPs) and standardize the recording of associated data for collection, processing, and storage of fluid biospecimens relevant to endometriosis.

designAn international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and 3 industry collaborators from 16 countries on 5 continents.

settingIn 2013, 2 workshops were conducted, followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research and sample processing worldwide. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Consensus SOPs were based on: [1] systematic comparison of SOPs from 18 global centers collecting fluid samples from women with and without endometriosis on a medium/large scale (publication on >100 cases), [2] literature evidence where available, or consultation with laboratory experts otherwise, and [3] several global consultation rounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standard recommended and minimum required SOPs for biofluid collection, processing, and storage in endometriosis research. RESULT(S): We developed recommended standard and minimum required SOPs for the collection, processing, and storage of plasma, serum, saliva, urine, endometrial/peritoneal fluid, and menstrual effluent, and a biospecimen data-collection form necessary for interpretation of sample-derived results. CONCLUSION(S): The Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project SOPs allow endometriosis research centers to decrease variability in biofluid sample results, facilitating between-center comparisons and collaborations. The procedures are also relevant to research into other female conditions involving biofluid samples subject to cyclic reproductive influences. The consensus SOPs are based on the best available evidence; areas with limited evidence are identified as requiring further pilot studies. The SOPs will be reviewed based on investigator feedback, and through systematic tri-annual follow-up. Updated versions will be made available at: endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicBlood Specimen CollectionEndometriosisFemaleHumansInternationalitySpecimen HandlingTissue Banksbiological fluid samplesEndometriosisEPHectstandardizationstandard operating procedures

Identifiers

PMID25256929
PMCPMC4230639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.