ArticleBMC systems biology2014
A Bayesian active learning strategy for sequential experimental design in systems biology.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective design and inference for cell sorting and sequencing based massively parallel reporter assays.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Exploring potential genes and pathways related to lung cancer: a graph theoretical analysis.Bioinformation · 2023Article
- Deep reinforcement learning for optimal experimental design in biology.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Active Learning Accelerates Design and Optimization of Hole-Transporting Materials for Organic Electronics.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Article
- Quantifying the relative importance of experimental data points in parameter estimation.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Recent Advances in the Systems Biology of Aging.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018Review
- CrossPlan: systematic planning of genetic crosses to validate mathematical models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Bayesian Networks Analysis of Malocclusion Data.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The Limitations of Model-Based Experimental Design and Parameter Estimation in Sloppy Systems.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundDynamical models used in systems biology involve unknown kinetic parameters. Setting these parameters is a bottleneck in many modeling projects. This motivates the estimation of these parameters from empirical data. However, this estimation problem has its own difficulties, the most important one being strong ill-conditionedness. In this context, optimizing experiments to be conducted in order to better estimate a system¿s parameters provides a promising direction to alleviate the difficulty of the task.ResultsBorrowing ideas from Bayesian experimental design and active learning, we propose a new strategy for optimal experimental design in the context of kinetic parameter estimation in systems biology. We describe algorithmic choices that allow to implement this method in a computationally tractable way and make it fully automatic. Based on simulation, we show that it outperforms alternative baseline strategies, and demonstrate the benefit to consider multiple posterior modes of the likelihood landscape, as opposed to traditional schemes based on local and Gaussian approximations.ConclusionThis analysis demonstrates that our new, fully automatic Bayesian optimal experimental design strategy has the potential to support the design of experiments for kinetic parameter estimation in systems biology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.