Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25255806›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2014

A versatile and highly efficient method for scarless genome editing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica.

Juhan Kim, Anthony M Webb, Jamie P Kershner, Stephen Blaskowski, Shelley D Copley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Native metabolomics identifies pteridines as CutA ligands and modulators of copper binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biofilm · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Toxin-based screening of C-terminal tags inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted genome editing inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Polyamines and linear DNA mediate bacterial threat assessment of bacteriophage infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Interplays of mutations inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. System metabolic engineering ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juhan Kim
Anthony M Webb
Jamie P Kershner
Stephen Blaskowski
Shelley D CopleyDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. shelley.copley@colorado.edu.

Funding

Elucidation and Evolutionary Potential of a Latent Pathway for PLP SynthesisR01GM083285 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI COPLEY, SHELLEY D. · 2008 to 2016
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM083285-06NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently developed methods for genome editing in bacteria take advantage of the introduction of double-strand breaks by I-SceI in a mutation cassette to select for cells in which homologous recombination has healed the break and introduced a desired mutation. This elegantly designed method did not work well in our hands for most genes.

resultsWe corrected a mutation in the gene encoding I-SceI that compromised the function of a previously used Red helper plasmid. Further, we found that transcription extending into the mutation cassette interferes with cleavage by I-SceI. Addition of two transcription terminators upstream of the cleavage site dramatically increases the efficiency of genome editing. We also developed an improved method for modification of essential genes. Inclusion of a segment of the essential gene consisting of synonymous codons restores an open reading frame when the mutation cassette is integrated into the genome and decreases the frequency of recombination events that fail to incorporate the desired mutation. The optimized protocol takes only 5 days and has been 100% successful for over 100 genomic modifications in our hands.

conclusionsThe method we describe here is reliable and versatile, enabling various types of genome editing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica by straightforward modifications of the mutation cassette. We provide detailed descriptions of the methods as well as designs for insertions, deletions, and introduction of point mutations.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialEscherichia coliGenes, EssentialMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationPlasmidsSalmonella enterica

Identifiers

PMID25255806
PMCPMC4236582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.