Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25255320›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Evidence for widespread positive and negative selection in coding and conserved noncoding regions of Capsella grandiflora.

Robert J Williamson, Emily B Josephs, Adrian E Platts, Khaled M Hazzouri, Annabelle Haudry, Mathieu Blanchette, Stephen I Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adaptation: by giant leaps or many tiny steps?Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fixation of Expression Divergences by Natural Selection inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic analyses elucidateEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert J WilliamsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily B JosephsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adrian E PlattsCentre for Bioinformatics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; School for Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Khaled M HazzouriDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Annabelle HaudryDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Université Lyon 1, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France.
Mathieu BlanchetteCentre for Bioinformatics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; School for Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAMcGill University · CALaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive · FRNew York University Abu Dhabi · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent that both positive and negative selection vary across different portions of plant genomes remains poorly understood. Here, we sequence whole genomes of 13 Capsella grandiflora individuals and quantify the amount of selection across the genome. Using an estimate of the distribution of fitness effects, we show that selection is strong in coding regions, but weak in most noncoding regions, with the exception of 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). However, estimates of selection on noncoding regions conserved across the Brassicaceae family show strong signals of selection. Additionally, we see reductions in neutral diversity around functional substitutions in both coding and conserved noncoding regions, indicating recent selective sweeps at these sites. Finally, using expression data from leaf tissue we show that genes that are more highly expressed experience stronger negative selection but comparable levels of positive selection to lowly expressed genes. Overall, we observe widespread positive and negative selection in coding and regulatory regions, but our results also suggest that both positive and negative selection on plant noncoding sequence are considerably rarer than in animal genomes.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceOpen Reading FramesSelection, GeneticUntranslated RegionsCapsellaEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, GeneticUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID25255320
PMCPMC4178662
OpenAlexW2952314547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.