Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25255213›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes.

Thomas A Hopf, Charlotta P I Schärfe, João P G L M Rodrigues, Anna G Green, Oliver Kohlbacher, Chris Sander, Alexandre M J J Bonvin, Debora S Marks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phase diagrams for biophysical fitness landscape design.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Two-Component Systems inVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas A HopfDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-9539
Charlotta P I SchärfeDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-6423
João P G L M RodriguesComputational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anna G GreenDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States.
Oliver KohlbacherApplied Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Chris SanderComputational Biology Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.
Alexandre M J J BonvinComputational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-1322
Debora S MarksDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-2281

Funding

Accelerated Determination of 3D Structures of Proteins and ComplexesR01GM106303 · NIGMS · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SANDER, CHRIS · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental to many biological processes. Experimental screens have identified tens of thousands of interactions, and structural biology has provided detailed functional insight for select 3D protein complexes. An alternative rich source of information about protein interactions is the evolutionary sequence record. Building on earlier work, we show that analysis of correlated evolutionary sequence changes across proteins identifies residues that are close in space with sufficient accuracy to determine the three-dimensional structure of the protein complexes. We evaluate prediction performance in blinded tests on 76 complexes of known 3D structure, predict protein-protein contacts in 32 complexes of unknown structure, and demonstrate how evolutionary couplings can be used to distinguish between interacting and non-interacting protein pairs in a large complex. With the current growth of sequences, we expect that the method can be generalized to genome-wide elucidation of protein-protein interaction networks and used for interaction predictions at residue resolution.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialProtein Interaction MappingDatabases, ProteinEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationEscherichia coli Proteinsco-evolutionE. colievolutionary biologygenomicsinteractionsprotein

Identifiers

PMID25255213
PMCPMC4360534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.