Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254981›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Development of a rapid agglutination latex test for diagnosis of enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in developing world: defining the biomarker, antibody and method.

Letícia B Rocha, Anna R R Santos, Danielle D Munhoz, Lucas T A Cardoso, Daniela E Luz, Fernanda B Andrade, Denise S P Q Horton, Waldir P Elias, Roxane M F Piazza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunogenic Domains and Secondary Structure ofFrontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  5. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Letícia B RochaLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anna R R SantosLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danielle D MunhozLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas T A CardosoLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela E LuzLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda B AndradeLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denise S P Q HortonLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Waldir P EliasLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roxane M F PiazzaLaboratório de Bacteriologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto Butantan · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EPEC/EHEC) are human intestinal pathogens responsible for diarrhea in both developing and industrialized countries. In research laboratories, EPEC and EHEC are defined on the basis of their pathogenic features; nevertheless, their identification in routine laboratories is expensive and laborious. Therefore, the aim of the present work was to develop a rapid and simple assay for EPEC/EHEC detection. Accordingly, the EPEC/EHEC-secreted proteins EspA and EspB were chosen as target antigens. METHODOLOGY: First, we investigated the ideal conditions for EspA/EspB production/secretion by ELISA in a collection of EPEC/EHEC strains after cultivating bacterial isolates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) or DMEM containing 1% tryptone or HEp-2 cells-preconditioned DMEM, employing either anti-EspA/anti-EspB polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies developed and characterized herein. Subsequently, a rapid agglutination latex test (RALT) was developed and tested with the same collection of bacterial isolates. PRINCIPAL

findingsEspB was defined as a biomarker and its corresponding monoclonal antibody as the tool for EPEC/EHEC diagnosis; the production of EspB was better in DMEM medium. RALT assay has the sensitivity and specificity required for high-impact diagnosis of neglected diseases in the developing world.

conclusionRALT assay described herein can be considered an alternative assay for diarrhea diagnosis in low-income countries since it achieved 97% sensitivity, 98% specificity and 97% efficiency.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBacterial Typing TechniquesBiomarkersDeveloping CountriesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansLatex Fixation TestsAntibodies, BacterialBiomarkersEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25254981
PMCPMC4177769
OpenAlexW2062436193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.