Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254957›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Multi-state modeling of biomolecules.

Melanie I Stefan, Thomas M Bartol, Terrence J Sejnowski, Mary B Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MCell-R: A Particle-Resolution Network-Free Spatial Modeling Framework.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. MESOSCOPIC MODELING OF STOCHASTIC REACTION-DIFFUSION KINETICS IN THE SUBDIFFUSIVE REGIME.Multiscale modeling & simulation : a SIAM interdisciplinary journal · 2016
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie I StefanDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Thomas M BartolSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Terrence J SejnowskiSalk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Mary B KennedyDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Ionic Cell Signaling in Small SpacesR01MH079076 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 2008 to 2012
$2.1M
Stochastic dynamics for multiscale biologyR01GM086883 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MJOLSNESS, ERIC D · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
CRCNS: Modeling Activation of CaMKII in SpinesR01DA030749 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KENNEDY, MARY B, SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDA NIH HHS DA030749NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030749NIGMS NIH HHS GM086883NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS P41-GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086883NIMH NIH HHS MH079076NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-state modeling of biomolecules refers to a series of techniques used to represent and compute the behavior of biological molecules or complexes that can adopt a large number of possible functional states. Biological signaling systems often rely on complexes of biological macromolecules that can undergo several functionally significant modifications that are mutually compatible. Thus, they can exist in a very large number of functionally different states. Modeling such multi-state systems poses two problems: the problem of how to describe and specify a multi-state system (the "specification problem") and the problem of how to use a computer to simulate the progress of the system over time (the "computation problem"). To address the specification problem, modelers have in recent years moved away from explicit specification of all possible states and towards rule-based formalisms that allow for implicit model specification, including the κ-calculus, BioNetGen, the Allosteric Network Compiler, and others. To tackle the computation problem, they have turned to particle-based methods that have in many cases proved more computationally efficient than population-based methods based on ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, or the Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm. Given current computing technology, particle-based methods are sometimes the only possible option. Particle-based simulators fall into two further categories: nonspatial simulators, such as StochSim, DYNSTOC, RuleMonkey, and the Network-Free Stochastic Simulator (NFSim), and spatial simulators, including Meredys, SRSim, and MCell. Modelers can thus choose from a variety of tools, the best choice depending on the particular problem. Development of faster and more powerful methods is ongoing, promising the ability to simulate ever more complex signaling processes in the future.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularBacteriaComputer SimulationDNAHumansProteinsSystems BiologyDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID25254957
PMCPMC4201162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.