Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254919›Full record

ReviewClinical obstetrics and gynecology2014

Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Kelly Cleland, Elizabeth G Raymond, Elizabeth Westley, James Trussell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Demographic and health impacts of women's bodily autonomy: switching prescription requirements for emergency contraceptives.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Contraceptive Behaviors in Polish Women Aged 18-35-a Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Pharmacology of Hormonal Emergency Contraceptive Pills.International journal of reproductive medicine · 2018
    Review
  19. State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly Cleland*Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey †Gynuity Health Projects ‡Family Care International, New York, New York.
Elizabeth G Raymond
Elizabeth Westley
James Trussell

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS 2R24HD047879NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several options for emergency contraception are available in the United States. This article describes each method, including efficacy, mode of action, safety, side effect profile, and availability. The most effective emergency contraceptive is the copper intrauterine device (IUD), followed by ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel pills. Levonorgestrel is available for sale without restrictions, whereas ulipristal acetate is available with prescription only, and the copper IUD must be inserted by a clinician. Although EC pills have not been shown to reduce pregnancy or abortion rates at the population level, they are an important option for individual women seeking to prevent pregnancy after sex.

Indexed as

Intrauterine Devices, CopperContraception, PostcoitalContraceptives, PostcoitalEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelNorpregnadienesPractice Guidelines as TopicContraceptives, PostcoitalLevonorgestrelNorpregnadienesulipristal acetate

Identifiers

PMID25254919
PMCPMC4216625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.