Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254500›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Assessment of humoral immune responses to blood-stage malaria antigens following ChAd63-MVA immunization, controlled human malaria infection and natural exposure.

Sumi Biswas, Prateek Choudhary, Sean C Elias, Kazutoyo Miura, Kathryn H Milne, Simone C de Cassan, Katharine A Collins, Fenella D Halstead, Carly M Bliss, Katie J Ewer and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Overview of the host immune response toJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Recombinant Vaccinia Virus ExpressingTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Microscopic and submicroscopic infection byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Role of Adenoviruses in Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sumi BiswasThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Prateek ChoudharyThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sean C EliasThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kazutoyo MiuraLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, NIAID/NIH, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Kathryn H MilneThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simone C de CassanThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Katharine A CollinsThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fenella D HalsteadThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carly M BlissThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Katie J EwerThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Faith H OsierKEMRI Centre for Geographic Medicine Research, Kilifi, Kenya.
Susanne H HodgsonThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christopher J A DuncanCentre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Geraldine A O'HaraCentre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carole A LongLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, NIAID/NIH, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Adrian V S HillThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Simon J DraperThe Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBJenner Institute · GBVector Oncology (United States) · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZIAAI001020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research Council G0700735Medical Research Council G1000527Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 084113/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 097940/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of protective vaccines against many difficult infectious pathogens will necessitate the induction of effective antibody responses. Here we assess humoral immune responses against two antigens from the blood-stage merozoite of the Plasmodium falciparum human malaria parasite--MSP1 and AMA1. These antigens were delivered to healthy malaria-naïve adult volunteers in Phase Ia clinical trials using recombinant replication-deficient viral vectors--ChAd63 to prime the immune response and MVA to boost. In subsequent Phase IIa clinical trials, immunized volunteers underwent controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with P. falciparum to assess vaccine efficacy, whereby all but one volunteer developed low-density blood-stage parasitemia. Here we assess serum antibody responses against both the MSP1 and AMA1 antigens following i) ChAd63-MVA immunization, ii) immunization and CHMI, and iii) primary malaria exposure in the context of CHMI in unimmunized control volunteers. Responses were also assessed in a cohort of naturally-immune Kenyan adults to provide comparison with those induced by a lifetime of natural malaria exposure. Serum antibody responses against MSP1 and AMA1 were characterized in terms of i) total IgG responses before and after CHMI, ii) responses to allelic variants of MSP1 and AMA1, iii) functional growth inhibitory activity (GIA), iv) IgG avidity, and v) isotype responses (IgG1-4, IgA and IgM). These data provide the first in-depth assessment of the quality of adenovirus-MVA vaccine-induced antibody responses in humans, along with assessment of how these responses are modulated by subsequent low-density parasite exposure. Notable differences were observed in qualitative aspects of the human antibody responses against these malaria antigens depending on the means of their induction and/or exposure of the host to the malaria parasite. Given the continued clinical development of viral vectored vaccines for malaria and a range of other diseases targets, these data should help to guide further immuno-monitoring studies of vaccine-induced human antibody responses.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBloodEnvironmental ExposureHumansImmunity, HumoralImmunoglobulin GMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesPan troglodytesPlasmodium falciparumSpecies SpecificityVaccinationVaccinia virusAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25254500
PMCPMC4177865
OpenAlexW2084121156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.