ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Identifying cell types from spatially referenced single-cell expression datasets.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining Mucosal Inflammation with Spatial Genomics.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
- CellTICS: an explainable neural network for cell-type identification and interpretation based on single-cell RNA-seq data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification of cell types in multiplexed in situ images by combining protein expression and spatial information using CELESTA.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Review
- STARCH: copy number and clone inference from spatial transcriptomics data.Physical biology · 2021Article
- SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes.Nature methods · 2018Article
- Programming Morphogenesis through Systems and Synthetic Biology.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
- Article
- Interrogating islets in health and disease with single-cell technologies.Molecular metabolism · 2017Review
- Brain transcriptome atlases: a computational perspective.Brain structure & function · 2017Review
- Statistical Methods in Integrative Genomics.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2016Article
- Myofibroblasts are distinguished from activated skin fibroblasts by the expression of AOC3 and other associated markers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- Epigenome overlap measure (EPOM) for comparing tissue/cell types based on chromatin states.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomics Bioinformatics and Computational Challenges.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Review
- Single punch, double biopsy.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- SINCERA: A Pipeline for Single-Cell RNA-Seq Profiling Analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin.Nature biotechnology · 2015Article
- Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex tissues, such as the brain, are composed of multiple different cell types, each of which have distinct and important roles, for example in neural function. Moreover, it has recently been appreciated that the cells that make up these sub-cell types themselves harbour significant cell-to-cell heterogeneity, in particular at the level of gene expression. The ability to study this heterogeneity has been revolutionised by advances in experimental technology, such as Wholemount in Situ Hybridizations (WiSH) and single-cell RNA-sequencing. Consequently, it is now possible to study gene expression levels in thousands of cells from the same tissue type. After generating such data one of the key goals is to cluster the cells into groups that correspond to both known and putatively novel cell types. Whilst many clustering algorithms exist, they are typically unable to incorporate information about the spatial dependence between cells within the tissue under study. When such information exists it provides important insights that should be directly included in the clustering scheme. To this end we have developed a clustering method that uses a Hidden Markov Random Field (HMRF) model to exploit both quantitative measures of expression and spatial information. To accurately reflect the underlying biology, we extend current HMRF approaches by allowing the degree of spatial coherency to differ between clusters. We demonstrate the utility of our method using simulated data before applying it to cluster single cell gene expression data generated by applying WiSH to study expression patterns in the brain of the marine annelid Platynereis dumereilii. Our approach allows known cell types to be identified as well as revealing new, previously unexplored cell types within the brain of this important model system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.