Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254363›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Identifying cell types from spatially referenced single-cell expression datasets.

Jean-Baptiste Pettit, Raju Tomer, Kaia Achim, Sylvia Richardson, Lamiae Azizi, John Marioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Statistical Methods in Integrative Genomics.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2016
    Article
  12. Myofibroblasts are distinguished from activated skin fibroblasts by the expression of AOC3 and other associated markers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Single punch, double biopsy.SpringerPlus · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jean-Baptiste PettitEuropean Bioinformatics Institute-European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Raju TomerDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kaia AchimDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sylvia RichardsonMRC Biostatistics Unit (MRC BSU), Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lamiae AziziMRC Biostatistics Unit (MRC BSU), Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John MarioniEuropean Bioinformatics Institute-European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_0801/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex tissues, such as the brain, are composed of multiple different cell types, each of which have distinct and important roles, for example in neural function. Moreover, it has recently been appreciated that the cells that make up these sub-cell types themselves harbour significant cell-to-cell heterogeneity, in particular at the level of gene expression. The ability to study this heterogeneity has been revolutionised by advances in experimental technology, such as Wholemount in Situ Hybridizations (WiSH) and single-cell RNA-sequencing. Consequently, it is now possible to study gene expression levels in thousands of cells from the same tissue type. After generating such data one of the key goals is to cluster the cells into groups that correspond to both known and putatively novel cell types. Whilst many clustering algorithms exist, they are typically unable to incorporate information about the spatial dependence between cells within the tissue under study. When such information exists it provides important insights that should be directly included in the clustering scheme. To this end we have developed a clustering method that uses a Hidden Markov Random Field (HMRF) model to exploit both quantitative measures of expression and spatial information. To accurately reflect the underlying biology, we extend current HMRF approaches by allowing the degree of spatial coherency to differ between clusters. We demonstrate the utility of our method using simulated data before applying it to cluster single cell gene expression data generated by applying WiSH to study expression patterns in the brain of the marine annelid Platynereis dumereilii. Our approach allows known cell types to be identified as well as revealing new, previously unexplored cell types within the brain of this important model system.

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualGene Expression ProfilingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMarkov ChainsPolychaetaSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25254363
PMCPMC4177667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.