Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254346›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2014

Neoblast specialization in regeneration of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea.

M Lucila Scimone, Kellie M Kravarik, Sylvain W Lapan, Peter W Reddien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. eLife · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A wound-induced differentiation trajectory for neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Lucila ScimoneHoward Hughes Medical Institute, MIT Biology, and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Kellie M KravarikHoward Hughes Medical Institute, MIT Biology, and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Sylvain W LapanHoward Hughes Medical Institute, MIT Biology, and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Peter W ReddienHoward Hughes Medical Institute, MIT Biology, and Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, 9 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Electronic address: reddien@wi.mit.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · US

Funding

PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007287 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELL, STEPHEN P., KEATING, AMY E · 1985 to 2019
$40.8M
Stem cell and regeneration regulatory genes in planariansR01GM080639 · NIGMS · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI REDDIEN, PETER · 2008 to 2020
$4.6M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080639NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM080639NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planarians can regenerate any missing body part in a process requiring dividing cells called neoblasts. Historically, neoblasts have largely been considered a homogeneous stem cell population. Most studies, however, analyzed neoblasts at the population rather than the single-cell level, leaving the degree of heterogeneity in this population unresolved. We combined RNA sequencing of neoblasts from wounded planarians with expression screening and identified 33 transcription factors transcribed in specific differentiated cells and in small fractions of neoblasts during regeneration. Many neoblast subsets expressing distinct tissue-associated transcription factors were present, suggesting candidate specification into many lineages. Consistent with this possibility, klf, pax3/7, and FoxA were required for the differentiation of cintillo-expressing sensory neurons, dopamine-β-hydroxylase-expressing neurons, and the pharynx, respectively. Together, these results suggest that specification of cell fate for most-to-all regenerative lineages occurs within neoblasts, with regenerative cells of blastemas being generated from a highly heterogeneous collection of lineage-specified neoblasts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCell DifferentiationHepatocyte Nuclear FactorsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMolecular Sequence DataPaired Box Transcription FactorsPlanariansRegenerationRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingSensory Receptor CellsSequence Analysis, RNAStem CellsTranscription FactorsHepatocyte Nuclear FactorsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsPaired Box Transcription FactorsRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25254346
PMCPMC4176530
OpenAlexW2081015430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.