Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254183›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical pediatrics2014

Preventing medication errors in neonatology: Is it a dream?

Roberto Antonucci, Annalisa Porcella

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The neonatal preventable harm index: a high reliability tool.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Roberto AntonucciRoberto Antonucci, Annalisa Porcella, Division of Neonatology and Pediatrics, "Nostra Signora di Bonaria" Hospital, 09037 San Gavino Monreale, Italy.
Annalisa PorcellaRoberto Antonucci, Annalisa Porcella, Division of Neonatology and Pediatrics, "Nostra Signora di Bonaria" Hospital, 09037 San Gavino Monreale, Italy.
Hospital del Niño · PA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1999, the problem of patient safety has drawn particular attention, becoming a priority in health care. A "medication error" (ME) is any preventable event occurring at any phase of the pharmacotherapy process (ordering, transcribing, dispensing, administering, and monitoring) that leads to, or can lead to, harm to the patient. Hence, MEs can involve every professional of the clinical team. MEs range from those with severe consequences to those with little or no impact on the patient. Although a high ME rate has been found in neonatal wards, newborn safety issues have not been adequately studied until now. Healthcare professionals working in neonatal wards are particularly susceptible to committing MEs due to the peculiarities of newborn patients and of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment. Current neonatal prevention strategies for MEs have been borrowed from adult wards, but many factors such as high costs and organizational barriers have hindered their diffusion. In general, two types of strategies have been proposed: the first strategy consists of identifying human factors that result in errors and redesigning the work in the NICU in order to minimize them; the second one suggests to design and implement effective systems for preventing errors or intercepting them before reaching the patient. In the future, prevention strategies for MEs need to be improved and tailored to the special neonatal population and the NICU environment and, at the same time, every effort will have to be made to support their clinical application.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsDrug safetyMedication errorsNewbornPrevention

Identifiers

PMID25254183
PMCPMC4162440
OpenAlexW2066466237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.