Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25254041›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology2014

Impact of NRAS Mutations on the Diagnosis of Follicular Neoplasm of the Thyroid.

Ja-Seong Bae, Seung Kyu Choi, Sora Jeon, Yourha Kim, Sohee Lee, Youn Soo Lee, Chan Kwon Jung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of endocrinology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Values of molecular markers in the differential diagnosis of thyroid abnormalities.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ja-Seong BaeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Seung Kyu ChoiDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea ; Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan-si, Chungnam 330-714, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7508-6123
Sora JeonDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Yourha KimDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-3432
Sohee LeeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-8853
Youn Soo LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Chan Kwon JungDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpodaero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-3708
Catholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Most patients with a preoperative diagnosis of thyroid follicular neoplasm (FN) undergo diagnostic surgery to determine whether the nodule is benign or malignant. Point mutations at NRAS codon 61 are the most common mutations observed in FN. However, the clinical significance of NRAS mutation remains unclear. Methods. From 2012 to 2013, 123 consecutive patients undergoing thyroidectomy for FN were evaluated prospectively. Molecular analyses for NRAS codon 61 were performed with pyrosequencing. Results. The overall malignancy rate in FN was 48.8% (60/123). Of 123 FNs, 33 (26.8%) were positive for the NRAS mutation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a NRAS mutation-positive FN specimen to predict malignancy were 37%, 83%, 67%, and 58%, respectively. Patients with a NRAS-positive FN had a higher malignancy rate in additional thyroid nodules beyond the FN than patients with a NRAS-negative FN. The overall malignancy rate of patients with a NRAS-positive FN was significantly higher than that of patients with a NRAS-negative FN (79% versus 52%; P = 0.008). Conclusions. Determining NRAS mutation status in FN helps to improve the accuracy of thyroid cancer diagnosis and to predict cancer risk in accompanying thyroid nodules.

Identifiers

PMID25254041
PMCPMC4164465
OpenAlexW2035911195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.