ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Extraesophageal saline enhances endoscopic ultrasonography to differentiate esophagus and adjacent organs.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo distinguish between the esophagus and adjacent organs using extraesophageal saline injection (ESI) in a canine model.
methodsESI was performed through the esophagus under the guidance of linear-array endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Approximately 15 mL of methylene blue saline (0.5%) was then injected through each of the extraesophageal puncture points using a 22 G needle. Radial EUS examinations were conducted before and after ESI. EUS images of the trachea, tracheal bifurcation, arcus aortae and thoracic aorta were recorded. Vital signs were monitored during the ESI procedure and EUS examination. The dogs were then sacrificed for exploratory thoracotomy.
resultsNo obvious fluctuation in vital signs or serious adverse events occurred during the ESI procedure. On EUS imaging, an apparent hypoechoic area outside the esophagus, which separated the esophagus and adjacent organs, was visualized. The adventitious of the esophagus and adjacent organs were easily distinguished. The findings of subsequent exploratory thoracotomy confirmed the EUS findings: obvious accumulation of a blue liquid in the extraesophageal tissues, as well as in the esophageal-thoracic aorta space, esophageal-arcus aortae space and esophageal-tracheal space.
conclusionThe esophagus and adjacent organs were successfully separated by ESI, and extraesophageal saline acted as an effective ultrasonic contrast agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.