ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2015
Feathers as a source of RNA for genomic studies in avian species.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feather RNA: A Non-Invasive Approach for Transcriptomic Profiling in Live Chickens.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Optimized methods for obtaining sequencing-quality RNA from blubber of free-ranging cetaceans collected under field conditions.Conservation physiology · 2026Article
- Nonrandom RNAseq gene expression associated with RNAlater and flash freezing storage methods.Molecular ecology resources · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dioxins and dioxin-like chemicals (DLCs) cause a suite of adverse effects in terrestrial species. Most of the adverse effects occur subsequent to binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Avian species vary in their sensitivity to the effects of DLCs and current research indicates that this is mediated by variations in the amino acid sequence within the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 (AHR1). Eighty-eight avian species have been classified into three broad categories of sensitivity, based on the amino acid variations within the AHR1 LBD: sensitive type 1 (Ile324_Ser380), moderately sensitive type 2 (Ile324_Ala380), and relatively insensitive type 3 (Val324_Ala380). Risk assessment of avian species can be complicated due to the variability in sensitivity among species. A predictive tool for selecting the priority species at a given site would have broad implications for the risk assessment community. We present a method for AHR1 genotyping using plucked feathers as a source of RNA. The method is extremely robust, requires minimal sample processing and handling, and eliminates the need for blood sampling or tissue collection from the species of interest. Using this method we were able to determine the amino acid sequence of the AHR LBD of three avian species: the chicken, the herring gull, and the zebra finch, and to categorize them based on the identity of amino acids at key sites within the LBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25253643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.