ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014
Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06189547 (Master's Student in Gastrointestinal Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Master's Student in Gastrointestinal Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of previous extrapulmonary malignancies on survival of surgically treated primary lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.PLoS medicine · 2015Guideline
- Representation and outcomes of individuals with major depression in routine care who are ineligible for randomized controlled trials: a nationwide register-based study.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Preoperative pulmonary function and nutrition predict survival in lung cancer patients with previous operated malignancies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for all-cause mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Recommendations for broadening eligibility criteria in esophagus cancer clinical trials: the mortality disparity of esophagus cancer as a first or second primary malignancy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Adaptive Bayesian information borrowing methods for finding and optimizing subgroup-specific doses.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Review
- Medical history of thyroid cancer does not impair prognosis in non-metastatic breast cancer patients: an analysis study based on SEER database and external cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prognostic impact of the presence or absence of prior cancer in patients with cancer using cure models: A population-based study.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Survival Among People With Second Primary Cancer in the US.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with versus without prior cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Is prior cancer history a hindrance for non-small cell lung cancer patients to participate in clinical trials?BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Prognosis of male lung cancer patients with urinary cancer: a study from a national population-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Survival of cancer survivors with a new pancreatic cancer diagnosis.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Revisiting Exclusion of Prior Cancer in Clinical Trials of Male Breast Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
- A New Approach to Simplifying and Harmonizing Cancer Clinical Trials-Standardizing Eligibility Criteria.JAMA oncology · 2022Article
- Potential Impact of Revised NCI Eligibility Criteria Guidance: Prior Malignancy Exclusion in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Tegafur-Uracil in Patients With Completely Resected, Node-Negative NSCLC-Real-World Data in the Era of Molecularly Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy.JTO clinical and research reports · 2022Article
- Effect of prior cancer history on survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma: a propensity score matching, population-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn oncology clinical trials, the assumption that a prior cancer diagnosis could interfere with study conduct or outcomes results in frequent exclusion of such patients. We determined the prevalence and characteristics of this practice in lung cancer clinical trials and estimated impact on trial accrual.
methodsWe reviewed lung cancer clinical trials sponsored or endorsed by the Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group for exclusion criteria related to a prior cancer diagnosis. We estimated prevalence of prior primary cancer diagnoses among lung cancer patients using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data. We assessed the association between trial characteristics and prior cancer exclusion using chi-square analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.
resultsFifty-one clinical trials (target enrollment 13072 patients) were included. Forty-one (80%) excluded patients with a prior cancer diagnosis as follows: any prior (14%), within five years (43%), within two or three years (7%), or active cancer (16%). In SEER-Medicare data (n = 210509), 56% of prior cancers were diagnosed within five years before the lung cancer diagnosis. Across trials, the estimated number and proportion of patients excluded because of prior cancer ranged from 0-207 and 0%-18%. Prior cancer was excluded in 94% of trials with survival primary endpoints and 73% of trials with nonsurvival primary endpoints (P = .06).
conclusionsA substantial proportion of patients are reflexively excluded from lung cancer clinical trials because of prior cancer. This inclusion criterion is applied widely across studies, including more than two-thirds of trials with nonsurvival endpoints. More research is needed to understand the basis and ramifications of this exclusion policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.