Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253583›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2015

Combination therapy of hypertension in the elderly: a subgroup analysis of the Combination of OLMesartan and a calcium channel blocker or diuretic in Japanese elderly hypertensive patients trial.

Toshio Ogihara, Takao Saruta, Hiromi Rakugi, Ikuo Saito, Kazuaki Shimamoto, Hiroaki Matsuoka, Satoshi Teramukai, Jitsuo Higaki, Sadayoshi Ito, Kazuyuki Shimada and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Management of Hypertension in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Structured Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Toshio OgiharaMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Takao SarutaKeio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi RakugiOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ikuo SaitoKeio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuaki ShimamotoSapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroaki MatsuokaDokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Satoshi TeramukaiKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan.
Jitsuo HigakiEhime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
Sadayoshi ItoTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazuyuki ShimadaShin-oyama City Hospital, Oyama, Japan.
COLM Investigators
Keio University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPMorinomiya University of Medical Sciences · JPSapporo Medical University · JPTohoku University · JPYamato Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination of OLMesartan and a calcium channel blocker or a diuretic in Japanese elderly hypertensive patients (COLM) trial demonstrated that olmesartan combinations with a CCB or diuretic have similar effects on reducing cardiovascular risk in elderly hypertensive patients. However, the safety profiles suggest that olmesartan combined with CCB may be preferable to olmesartan combined with diuretic. In this subgroup analysis, we further evaluated the effects and safety of these combinations in elderly (65-74 years old (y.o.)) and very elderly (75-84 y.o.) hypertensive patients. In the COLM trial, 5141 patients (2918 elderly and 2223 very elderly) were randomly assigned to receive olmesartan-based therapy with either CCB or diuretic. The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, in the elderly age group and in the very elderly group were: 1.04 (0.72-1.50; olmesartan plus CCB vs. olmesartan plus diuretic, P = 0.85) and 0.71 (0.51-0.99, P = 0.045) for the primary composite end point, and 1.07 (0.67-1.72, P = 0.77) and 0.64 (0.42-0.98, P = 0.036) for the composite of hard end points. The hazard ratios for stroke (fatal and non-fatal) were 1.48 (0.88-2.48; olmesartan plus CCB vs. olmesartan plus diuretic, P = 0.13) and 0.63 (0.39-1.02, P = 0.059) (interaction-P = 0.019). Withdrawal rates from the trial, withdrawal due to serious adverse event and the incidence of any adverse event were higher in the olmesartan plus diuretic group than in the olmesartan plus CCB group in both age groups. In conclusion, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and CCB combination may be preferable to an ARB and diuretic combination in the very elderly hypertensive patients for the reduction of cardiovascular risk, particularly for the reduction in stroke risk.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionImidazolesMaleTetrazolesAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID25253583
PMCPMC4287656
OpenAlexW2013954855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.