Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253474›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Synaptic transmission between end bulbs of Held and bushy cells in the cochlear nucleus of mice with a mutation in Otoferlin.

Samantha Wright, Youngdeok Hwang, Donata Oertel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cochlear Amplification Modulates Synaptic Transmission at the Endbulb of Held Synapse in the Cochlear Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Auditory brainstem development and plasticity.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurod1 Is Essential for the Primary Tonotopic Organization and Related Auditory Information Processing in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Changes in Properties of Auditory Nerve Synapses following Conductive Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Dynamin 1- and 3-Mediated Endocytosis Is Essential for the Development of a Large Central Synapse In Vivo.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha WrightDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and.
Youngdeok HwangI.B.M. Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York.
Donata OertelDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and doertel@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USIBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center · US

Funding

IN VITRO STUDIES OF THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUSR01DC000176 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, DONATA OERTEL · 1989 to 2014
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC-00176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice that carry a mutation in a calcium binding domain of Otoferlin, the putative calcium sensor at hair cell synapses, have normal distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), but auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) are absent. In mutant mice mechanotransduction is normal but transmission of acoustic information to the auditory pathway is blocked even before the onset of hearing. The cross-sectional area of the auditory nerve of mutant mice is reduced by 54%, and the volume of ventral cochlear nuclei is reduced by 46% relative to hearing control mice. While the tonotopic organization was not detectably changed in mutant mice, the axons to end bulbs of Held and the end bulbs themselves were smaller. In mutant mice bushy cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (aVCN) have the electrophysiological hallmarks of control cells. Spontaneous miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) occur with similar frequencies and have similar shapes in deaf as in hearing animals, but they are 24% larger in deaf mice. Bushy cells in deaf mutant mice are contacted by ∼2.6 auditory nerve fibers compared with ∼2.0 in hearing control mice. Furthermore, each fiber delivers more synaptic current, on average 4.8 nA compared with 3.4 nA, in deaf versus hearing control mice. The quantal content of evoked EPSCs is not different between mutant and control mice; the increase in synaptic current delivered in mutant mice is accounted for by the increased response to the size of the quanta. Although responses to shocks presented at long intervals are larger in mutant mice, they depress more rapidly than in hearing control mice.

Indexed as

Synaptic TransmissionAnimalsCochlear NerveCochlear NucleusDeafnessElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearingMaleMembrane PotentialsMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNeuronsMembrane Proteinsotoferlin protein, mousecochlear nucleuselectrophysiologyexcitatory postsynaptic currentsmouseOtoferlin

Identifiers

PMID25253474
PMCPMC4269706
OpenAlexW2328443757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.