ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2014
A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring genetic values and variances from pre-processed phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Use of Cluster Analysis for Identifying Metafounders.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole-genome sequencing data analysis.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Estimation of (co)variance components for very large datasets and complex single-step genomic models.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.Genetics · 2025Article
- Mutual information-based best linear unbiased prediction for enhanced genomic prediction accuracy.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Leveraging data from commercial cattle for genetic improvement- an international perspective.Journal of animal science · 2025Review
- A computationally feasible multi-trait single-step genomic prediction model with trait-specific marker weights.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Genome-wide association analysis of the resistance to infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus in two rainbow trout aquaculture lines confirms oligogenic architecture with several moderate effect quantitative trait loci.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Interpreting single-step genomic evaluation as a neural network of three layers: pedigree, genotypes, and phenotypes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Genetic analysis of geometric morphometric 3D visuals of French jumping horses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Single-step genomic evaluation for growth traits in a Mexican Braunvieh cattle population.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
- Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- A breed-of-origin of alleles model that includes crossbred data improves predictive ability for crossbred animals in a multi-breed population.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Validation with single-step SNPBLUP shows that evaluations can continue using a single mean of genotyped individuals, even with multiple breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo obtain predictions that are not biased by selection, the conditional mean of the breeding values must be computed given the data that were used for selection. When single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects have a normal distribution, it can be argued that single-step best linear unbiased prediction (SS-BLUP) yields a conditional mean of the breeding values. Obtaining SS-BLUP, however, requires computing the inverse of the dense matrix G of genomic relationships, which will become infeasible as the number of genotyped animals increases. Also, computing G requires the frequencies of SNP alleles in the founders, which are not available in most situations. Furthermore, SS-BLUP is expected to perform poorly relative to variable selection models such as BayesB and BayesC as marker densities increase.
methodsA strategy is presented for Bayesian regression models (SSBR) that combines all available data from genotyped and non-genotyped animals, as in SS-BLUP, but accommodates a wider class of models. Our strategy uses imputed marker covariates for animals that are not genotyped, together with an appropriate residual genetic effect to accommodate deviations between true and imputed genotypes. Under normality, one formulation of SSBR yields results identical to SS-BLUP, but does not require computing G or its inverse and provides richer inferences. At present, Bayesian regression analyses are used with a few thousand genotyped individuals. However, when SSBR is applied to all animals in a breeding program, there will be a 100 to 200-fold increase in the number of animals and an associated 100 to 200-fold increase in computing time. Parallel computing strategies can be used to reduce computing time. In one such strategy, a 58-fold speedup was achieved using 120 cores. DISCUSSION: In SSBR and SS-BLUP, phenotype, genotype and pedigree information are combined in a single-step. Unlike SS-BLUP, SSBR is not limited to normally distributed marker effects; it can be used when marker effects have a t distribution, as in BayesA, or mixture distributions, as in BayesB or BayesC π. Furthermore, it has the advantage that matrix inversion is not required. We have investigated parallel computing to speedup SSBR analyses so they can be used for routine applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.