Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253422›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2015

Remote degeneration: insights from the hemicerebellectomy model.

Maria Teresa Viscomi, Laura Latini, Elisa Bisicchia, Valeria Sasso, Marco Molinari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Time Is Cerebellum.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Teresa ViscomiI.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia Foundation, Via del Fosso di Fiorano 65, 00143, Rome, Italy, mt.viscomi@hsantalucia.it.
Laura Latini
Elisa Bisicchia
Valeria Sasso
Marco Molinari

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When CNS lesions develop, neuronal degeneration occurs locally but in regions that are remote, yet functionally connected, to the primary lesion site. This process, known as "remote damage," significantly affects long-term outcomes in many CNS pathologies, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, and traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. Remote damage can last several days or months after the primary lesion, providing a window during which therapeutic approaches can be implemented to effect neuroprotection. The recognition of the importance of remote damage in determining disease outcomes has prompted considerable interest in examining remote damage-associated mechanisms, most of which is derived from the potential of this research to develop innovative pharmacological approaches for preserving neurons and improving functional outcomes. To this end, the hemicerebellectomy (HCb) experimental paradigm has been instrumental in highlighting the complexity and variety of the systems that are involved, identifying mechanisms of life/death decisions, and providing a testing ground for novel neuroprotective approaches. Inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, autophagy, and neuronal changes in receptor mosaics are several remote damage mechanisms that have been identified and examined using the HCb model. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of remote degeneration mechanisms and their potential for exploitation with regard to neuroprotective approaches, focusing on HCb studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DeathCerebellumDisease Models, AnimalNerve DegenerationNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.