Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253417›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2015

Effective treatment of diverse medulloblastoma models with mebendazole and its impact on tumor angiogenesis.

Ren-Yuan Bai, Verena Staedtke, Charles M Rudin, Fred Bunz, Gregory J Riggins

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02644291 (Phase I Study of Mebendazole Therapy for Recurrent/Progressive Pediatric Brain Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02644291 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Phase I Study of Mebendazole Therapy for Recurrent/Progressive Pediatric Brain Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsRan2016 to 2022Enrolled16ConditionsMedulloblastoma, Astrocytoma, Grade III, Glioblastoma, Anaplastic AstrocytomaArmsMebendazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ren-Yuan BaiDepartment of Neurosurgery (R.-Y.B., G.J.R.), Department of Neurology (V.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (F.B.); Department of Thoracic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (C.M.R.).
Verena StaedtkeDepartment of Neurosurgery (R.-Y.B., G.J.R.), Department of Neurology (V.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (F.B.); Department of Thoracic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (C.M.R.).
Charles M RudinDepartment of Neurosurgery (R.-Y.B., G.J.R.), Department of Neurology (V.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (F.B.); Department of Thoracic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (C.M.R.).
Fred BunzDepartment of Neurosurgery (R.-Y.B., G.J.R.), Department of Neurology (V.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (F.B.); Department of Thoracic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (C.M.R.).
Gregory J RigginsDepartment of Neurosurgery (R.-Y.B., G.J.R.), Department of Neurology (V.S.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (F.B.); Department of Thoracic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (C.M.R.).
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Research Education Program for Residents and Fellows in Neurology - PorrasR25NS065729 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HILLIS, ARGYE E. · 2009 to 2024
$3.3M
Targeting the ATR pathway in p53-deficient cancersR01CA157535 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BUNZ, FRED · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157535NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065729NINDS NIH HHS R25NS065729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Current standard treatments cure 40%-60% of patients, while the majority of survivors suffer long-term neurological sequelae. The identification of 4 molecular groups of medulloblastoma improved the clinical management with the development of targeted therapies; however, the tumor acquires resistance quickly. Mebendazole (MBZ) has a long safety record as antiparasitic in children and has been recently implicated in inhibition of various tyrosine kinases in vitro. Here, we investigated the efficacy of MBZ in various medulloblastoma subtypes and MBZ's impact on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and tumor angiogenesis.

methodsThe inhibition of MBZ on VEGFR2 kinase was investigated in an autophosphorylation assay and a cell-free kinase assay. Mice bearing orthotopic PTCH1-mutant medulloblastoma allografts, a group 3 medulloblastoma xenograft, and a PTCH1-mutant medulloblastoma with acquired resistance to the smoothened inhibitor vismodegib were treated with MBZ. The survival benefit and the impact on tumor angiogenesis and VEGFR2 kinase function were analyzed.

resultsWe determined that MBZ interferes with VEGFR2 kinase by competing with ATP. MBZ selectively inhibited tumor angiogenesis but not the normal brain vasculatures in orthotopic medulloblastoma models and suppressed VEGFR2 kinase in vivo. MBZ significantly extended the survival of medulloblastoma models derived from different molecular backgrounds.

conclusionOur findings support testing of MBZ as a possible low-toxicity therapy for medulloblastomas of various molecular subtypes, including tumors with acquired vismodegib resistance. Its antitumor mechanism may be partially explained by inhibition of tumor angiogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMebendazoleMedulloblastomaMiceMice, NudeNeovascularization, PathologicTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Antineoplastic AgentsMebendazoleVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2angiogenesismebendazolemedulloblastomaVEGFVEGFR2

Identifiers

PMID25253417
PMCPMC4483072
OpenAlexW2315265027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.