Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25253298›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

SCN1B gene variants in Brugada Syndrome: a study of 145 SCN5A-negative patients.

Maria Teresa Ricci, Silvia Menegon, Simona Vatrano, Giorgia Mandrile, Natascia Cerrato, Paula Carvalho, Mario De Marchi, Fiorenzo Gaita, Carla Giustetto, Daniela Francesca Giachino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Brugada Syndrome: Oligogenic or Mendelian Disease?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. AnFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Teresa Ricci1] Medical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy [2] Medical Genetics, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Silvia MenegonMedical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Simona VatranoMedical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Giorgia Mandrile1] Medical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy [2] Medical Genetics, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Natascia Cerrato1] Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy [2] Division of Cardiology, University of Torino, Dept. Medical Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Paula CarvalhoCardiology Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Mario De Marchi1] Medical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy [2] Medical Genetics, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Fiorenzo Gaita1] Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy [2] Division of Cardiology, University of Torino, Dept. Medical Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Carla Giustetto1] Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy [2] Division of Cardiology, University of Torino, Dept. Medical Sciences, Torino, Italy.
Daniela Francesca Giachino1] Medical Genetics, University of Torino, Dept. Clinical &Biological Sciences, Torino, Italy [2] Medical Genetics, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brugada syndrome is characterised by a typical ECG with ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads. Individuals with this condition are susceptible to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The principal gene responsible for this syndrome is SCN5A, which encodes the α-subunit of the Nav1.5 voltage-gated sodium channel. Mutations involving other genes have been increasingly reported, but their contribution to Brugada syndrome has been poorly investigated. Here we focused on the SCN1B gene, which encodes the β1-subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel and its soluble β1b isoform. SCN1B mutations have been associated with Brugada syndrome as well as with other cardiac arrhythmias and familial epilepsy. In this study, we have analysed SCN1B exons (including the alternatively-spliced exon 3A) and 3'UTR in 145 unrelated SCN5A-negative patients from a single centre. We took special care to report all identified variants (including polymorphisms), following the current nomenclature guidelines and considering both isoforms. We found two known and two novel (and likely deleterious) SCN1B variants. We also found two novel changes with low evidence of pathogenicity. Our findings contribute more evidence regarding the occurrence of SCN1B variants in Brugada syndrome, albeit with a low prevalence, which is in agreement with previous reports.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsAdolescentAdultAgedBrugada SyndromeChildDeath, Sudden, CardiacExonsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPolymorphism, GeneticVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel beta-1 Subunit3' Untranslated RegionsNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN1B protein, humanVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel beta-1 Subunit

Identifiers

PMID25253298
PMCPMC5377327
OpenAlexW2011372401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.